I ordered "Investing Online for Dummies" and hope that will help.
I haven't read it, but for myself I wouldn't expect a book about
investing to be particuarly helpful for
trading. That's exactly what I was alluding to, in my post above. I may be wrong. Just be aware that terminology can sometimes be defined differently in different contexts, and investing is surely a very different context, in this sense, from trading. (The author may distinguish clearly between the two, though - those "
For Dummies" books do tend to be pretty well written and edited, in my limited experience of them.)
From my ignorant position it seems my confusion would be between day trading and swing trading
"Swing trading" is a classic example of a term that different authors use with very different meanings.
For example, Alan Farley, the author of what's very widely in some circles regarded as the standard textbook on swing trading (
The Master Swing Trader) goes to quite some lengths in the opening few pages to explain that "swing trading" isn't "in contrast to daytrading" at all, that the term "swing trading" in itself has nothing to do with the duration of the trades, and that "swing trades" can be intraday or over longer periods. (I don't like his book, myself, don't regard it as well written, and didn't find it helpful at all, but others may well disagree, and in fact it seems they probably do, because the book's certainly become "the authority" on the subject.)
placing such a restriction on yourself still seems absurd to me.
It will, perhaps, until you know more about how the markets work on a practical level, margin requirements, and so on.
When a person buys a stock it seems to me they must expect it to rise to a certain point and then sell it. If it doesn't happen to do that on the day they bought it it seems they should wait and see if it does it the following day, or the next.
Again, you're looking at trading in terms of investing, with that comment, David.
But then they don't have the money to play with as you mentioned and it could keep going down for a while. So from my ignorant pov it seems that's the time to buy more, not sell at a loss.
That's called "averaging down" and is something to avoid. The rationale is that if it was a good buy at $x, then it "must be" an even better buy at a lower price than $x. The fallacy is that some trades are good and some are inevitably bad, and one of the ways to identify the bad ones is that they move against you quickly.
This is especially true of penny stocks (since you mentioned those in your OP), in which typically one's expectation is that the great majority of trades will lose money, but the occasional successful one can pay for them many times over. The economics of doing that are somewhat similar to those of fiction publishing, from a trade publisher's perspective: 90% of titles actually lose money, but the business can still be very profitable overall, because of the occasional "jackpot". Some businesses are like this. It's particularly important, if embarking on them, to be both
very well informed and
very well funded!
I mean absolutely no disrespect at all, and I appreciate of course that you're at the start of a learning-curve, here, but for what it's worth I repeat my original suggestion (also apparently shared by some others replying to you) that penny stocks and daytrading should both be high on your list of things to avoid.
Also - you should definitely listen to Handle123, on this subject: I know that he has more directly relevant experience of it than I have.