Quote from The Kin2:
This could theoretically go on forever with desirable economic results.
Yes, from administration to administration and this is the point I was eluding to in my earlier comment.
Because the USD is the reserve oil dollar, only one country can legally obtain oil by printing money, everyone else has to earn the money and exchange their currency for dollars.
Adding to this inside track advantage is Washington's attitude, that foreigners do not lend money to the US, but rather they are investing in the US economy.
A suitable spin, but one the very much puts the risk back firmly on the foreigner. (quite unlike argentina)
Or to put it in plain words, US cannot default, but foreigners can make bad decisions based on washington supplied information. Argentina, I might add, claimed that they did everything that the IMF ( washington backed) advised.
For your average American, their life style peaked around 1974. This was a time when they were deepest within their earning/spending cycle.
Fast forward 30+ years and saddam is selling oil in euros, which of course the fed cannot print.
And so the new new game in town is topple saddam, win the hearts and minds of ALL Iraqis and bind the gulf states into one common currency that is dollar bound.
It was a plan dreamt up by a group of very unworldly people and never stood a chance of success, unless you call sucking in Blair a success story.
Mind you, if you set the bar low enough, anyone can clear it.
Now kuwait has announced that it has removed the dollar peg followed by syria and soon to be followed by UAE.
This is most likely a forunner to shifting oil sales into a basket of currencies and dropping the dollar.
So, while all attention is diverted towards china there is big big trouble ahead with the gulf states. This includes iran which could easily be the next fall guy and leaves Venezuela in a very interesting position.
So in response to the OP 'is debt a bad thing for the US'
I guess only time will tell.