Whenever I wanted to play a change in Vega in the past I have looked at the ATM options with a far off expiration.
But if someone wanted to profit from a a $1000 dollar investment in a change in the volatility (lets say an increase) would they be better off buying out-of-the-money options which they could buy many more of if the net Vega was higher?
E.g.
a) Buy $1000 worth of ATM option: Vega = 33 and price = 3.30
Net Vega = 100
or
b) Buy $1000 worth of OTM option: Vega = 3 and price = .10
Net Vega = 300
Seems like the higher net vega is a superior choice and the it may reduce some other risks as well...
Any thoughts?? It just seems counter-intuitive....

But if someone wanted to profit from a a $1000 dollar investment in a change in the volatility (lets say an increase) would they be better off buying out-of-the-money options which they could buy many more of if the net Vega was higher?
E.g.
a) Buy $1000 worth of ATM option: Vega = 33 and price = 3.30
Net Vega = 100
or
b) Buy $1000 worth of OTM option: Vega = 3 and price = .10
Net Vega = 300
Seems like the higher net vega is a superior choice and the it may reduce some other risks as well...
Any thoughts?? It just seems counter-intuitive....
