I have never taken Van Tharp's
Peak Performance course but I have read both his books and found them extremely useful and refreshing in that they
didn't stress specific trading strategies, entries, etc. Prior to reading them I had never considered the major role my psychology plays in my trading, but now it's so frightfully obvious.
As to whether the Peak Performance course is worth the money that's hard to say until you've taken it and committed the time. If so, it's a very small price to pay vis a vis the potential gains. And I respect the money-back guarantee as quoted and explained by Robert.
Regarding the endless (dare I say, useless) debate over the infamous
those who can do, those who can't teach, there have been a large number of great teachers and coaches who didn't participate as a
player in their respective arena. Vince Lombardi and John Wooden come immediately to mind in the sports field. In any case, each side is convinced of the righteousness of their position, and either you are open to receive teaching or you are always suspect of your teacher.
It was asked:
If he is good at trading, why waste time teaching? Personally, I don't see the connection as the question assumes that everybody should do
anything they are good at?! There could be many, many reasons why a person who might be excellent at coaching traders, would chose not to trade himself. Without oversimplifying it, he may simply not have the desire or temperament to trade.
I guess the flipside to the teaching issue is one of my favorite quotes by Flannery O'Connor who said:
Everywhere I go I'm asked if I think the university stifles writers. My opinion is that they don't stifle enough of them. There's many a bestseller that could have been prevented by a good teacher. 