You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Van Jones on why Bush was more successful than Obama
- Thread starter drjekyllus
- Start date
Quote from drjekyllus:
The difference between Van Jones and a Cabinet member is a Cabinet member actually has to go through a confirmation hearing.
How many more times are people going to make excuses for Obama being associated with extremist?
We have Rev. Wright who Obama said was like a family member. Obama went to the church for 20 years, but never knew what Wright was all about.
You have Bill Ayers a domestic terrorist who in 2001 said he didn't regret setting bombs, his only regret was that he didnt do more. Obama's excuse for the one was that he was only 8 when Ayers was setting bombs. Wow, what a great guy.
Then there is Tony Rezko who Obama was hooked up in crooked land deals with.
The guys wife said in 2008 that it was the first time in her adult life she was actually proud of America.
There is also Pfleger and Rashid Khalidi.
Is Robert Gates an extremist?
What about Hillary Clinton?
Biden?
Jim Jones?
Geithner?
Bernake?
STFU! There are bigger differences between a genuine cabinet member and Van Jones. Van Jones does NOT sit on the cabinet. Van Jones reports to Nancy Sutley (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_House_Council_on_Environmental_Quality) and she reports to Rahm emanuel.
Quote from IShopAtPublix:
Maybe Obama just put him on the governmental payroll as a favor.
We have a winner for the idiotic post of the day.
WHY WOULD OBAMA GIVE A COMMUNIST A JOB ON THE GOVERNMENT'S PAYROLL JUST FOR A FAVOR?
Liberal logic at work once again. Actually now that I think about it, it does sort of make sense. Obama has moved terrorists to Bermuda and given them beachside bungalows, all on the taxpayers dime. Why wouldn't he give a fellow comrade in the struggle against racist, rich white capitalist a job on taxpayers money? It still leaves one question unanswered. Why hasn't the most transparent government(i.e. the government lead by Obama, at least thats what he told us.) in the history of the world, come out and told this was the deal?
BO is learning that being President is no fun. You actually have to make decisions and people are going to judge you on those decisions. Its not like being in the state or US Senate when you can just vote present when you don't want people to know what you think on an issue. Who would have though that having a communist advisor who reports to no one, except the President of the United States who have caused such a problem?
Quote from drjekyllus:
We have a winner for the idiotic post of the day.
WHY WOULD OBAMA GIVE A COMMUNIST A JOB ON THE GOVERNMENT'S PAYROLL JUST FOR A FAVOR?
Liberal logic at work once again. Actually now that I think about it, it does sort of make sense. Obama has moved terrorists to Bermuda and given them beachside bungalows, all on the taxpayers dime. Why wouldn't he give a fellow comrade in the struggle against racist, rich white capitalist a job on taxpayers money? It still leaves one question unanswered. Why hasn't the most transparent government(i.e. the government lead by Obama, at least thats what he told us.) in the history of the world, come out and told this was the deal?
BO is learning that being President is no fun. You actually have to make decisions and people are going to judge you on those decisions. Its not like being in the state or US Senate when you can just vote present when you don't want people to know what you think on an issue. Who would have though that having a communist advisor who reports to no one, except the President of the United States who have caused such a problem?
I mean you never heard of people having friendships and relationships despite political beliefs? Do you honestly believe that association with certain people makes your political beliefs the same as theirs? You are a moron if you do.
Quote from IShopAtPublix:
Is Robert Gates an extremist?
What about Hillary Clinton?
Biden?
Jim Jones?
Geithner?
Bernake?
STFU! There are bigger differences between a genuine cabinet member and Van Jones. Van Jones does NOT sit on the cabinet. Van Jones reports to Nancy Sutley (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_House_Council_on_Environmental_Quality) and she reports to Rahm emanuel.
Exactly he does not sit on Cabinet. He is actually more powerful than a Cabinet member. Van Jones has zero Congressional oversight.
Quote from IShopAtPublix:
I mean you never heard of people having friendships and relationships despite political beliefs? Do you honestly believe that association with certain people makes your political beliefs the same as theirs? You are a moron if you do.
When you have relationships with as many radicals as Obama does, yes it is apparent he shares those views. We only have to take him at his word.
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_1UPqXTn47g&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_1UPqXTn47g&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
Doesn't sound like this guy is too much into that pesky US Constitution.
Quote from drjekyllus:
When you have relationships with as many radicals as Obama does, yes it is apparent he shares those views. We only have to take him at his word.
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_1UPqXTn47g&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_1UPqXTn47g&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
Doesn't sound like this guy is too much into that pesky US Constitution.
2001 interview, that is deep. What was the interview? Who was taking it? What was the agenda? Maybe Barack Obama wanted to be like Jesse Jackson at that time? Maybe he was speaking to a black audience.
Quote from IShopAtPublix:
You are such a moron. He reports to a person unanimously confirmed by the US senate. Nancy Sutley. Shut the fuck up.
This article is for you, since you're all into calling people names and such...
September 02, 2009
Republicans are What?!
Lauri Regan
According to Obamaâs Green Jobâs Czar, Van Jones, Republicans âare a**holes.â And guess what? âBarack Obama is not an asshole.â
So there you have it in a nutshell. Barack Obama, the non-asshole wearing the white hat, is struggling in his attempt to force his socialist agenda down the throats of unwilling Americans and itâs those asshole Republicans wearing the black hats that are to blame. As I stated in a recent AT article, Americans have been called mobsters, racists, partisan, stupid, un-American, and mean, just to name of few of the accusations pouring out of this administration. And now we are assholes because we do not like the direction in which Obama is hell bent on taking the country, popular opinion be damned.
One would think that it would have been obvious that Obamaâs campaign promise to end the partisanship would be thrown under the bus when he announced that he won so it would be his way or the highway. However, we Americans who cling to guns and religion are smarter than he expected and with each passing day of bullying and threatening, his poll numbers drop. Letâs hope and pray that these morons keep up the name calling â theyâll continue to alienate the electorate and find themselves back under the real holes from which they crawled. And theyâll be clueless as to how they lost their grip on power â thatâs the nature of a bully and a person that only knows how to call people names. Perhaps we Republicans should remind them of that catchy little playground retort:
âI am rubber and you are glue. Whatever you say bounces off of me and sticks to you.â
George Joyce adds:
At an energy lecture at Cal Berkeley back in February, Van Jones, who is Barack Obamaâs senior âgreen jobsâ advisor, responded to an audience memberâs question by calling Republicans âAssholes.â
In a recently posted YouTube video currently circulating on the internet Jones tries to answer a young womanâs concern about congressional Republican intransigence on Obamaâs legislative agenda by saying:
âWell, the answer to that is, they're assholes. That's a technical, political science term.â
As the crowd burst into laughter Jones followed up by saying:
âNow, I will say this. I can be an asshole, and some of us who are not Barack Hussein Obama are going to have to start getting a little bit uppity.â
Letâs see. Nancy Pelosi called town hall protesters âNazisâ and Harry Reid labeled anti-Obama demonstrators âevil.â Now Jones finds the word âassholesâ even more fitting for conservatives â technical in fact.
I wouldnât expect âEvil Nazi Assholesâ to score very high on a liberal intellectualâs âquality of life index.â This makes me doubly nervous about just what the word âuppityâ means. As far as those purported quality of life panels go in other words, maybe Republicans, not just the elderly, should be a little concerned.