Using Quantum Physics to "play the market"

Turveyd said:
Quantum entanglement states that a particles subatomic state when entangled with another particle switches states instantaneously.

I don't know if I really believe in that, don't get me wrong I'm a skeptical atheist science guy, but some things are just to out there and fringey, give it 50years they'll likely find an error in there testing or a more rational explanation for the effect.

Science encourages questioning and doubting, religion the opposite so it's good to question everything.
More...

They did an experiment which showed effect was real...
 
Spectre2007 said:
They did an experiment which showed effect was real...
More...

They've done experiments for 100's of years which proved things where real, which we now laugh at these days, pyhsics books from 50 years ago are all complete nonsense and will likely in 50years make ours look the same.

After all, looking at which way an atom is spinning here.

I also don't accept the big bang theory and loads of other things.
 
Spectre2007 said:
They did an experiment which showed effect was real...
More...

I believe he's arguing that the test could be flawed in someway; that the world can only exist in ways humans can physically imagine; that we should question everything, like religion [and especially atheism]. :)
 
Turveyd said:
They've done experiments for 100's of years which proved things where real, which we now laugh at these days, pyhsics books from 50 years ago are all complete nonsense and will likely in 50years make ours look the same.

After all, looking at which way an atom is spinning here.

I also don't accept the big bang theory and loads of other things.
More...

Examples of those experiments would be interesting to read.

Complete nonsense is a leap as well.
 
userque said:
I believe he's arguing that the test could be flawed in someway; that the world can only exist in ways humans can physically imagine; that we should question everything, like religion [and especially atheism]. :)
More...

Ermm, just the first part, we are a long long long way from fully understanding everything and will likely never, we are still trying to make sense of things we don't fully understand, we are trying, which is good, but we are a long long way off, 1000's of years IMHO!!

It could ofcourse be correct, not saying it isn't or is, just saying saying it's proven and done is a bit far fetched for me at this stage. There might be other explanations, we can't even contemplate at the moment.


( none involving 'god' that's just utter, man made BS )
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top