Matt,
I think you have a broader selection of Platforms and Clearing Brokers than anyone else at https://optimusfutures.com/Platform-Pricing.php.
I see you have several Tradestation Platforms and Tradestation Clearing listed. Is there any chance you could add the TradeStation Options+ platform as well, which is their white label of OptionsCity CityTrader? I know that you have CityTrader already through Wedbush, but I have a feeling that the Tradestation version could be offered at lower cost, because they charge no fees (!) under special offers to their own customers to use it (no routing fee, no platform fee) with commissions as low as 45 cents.
https://www.tradestation.com/promo/tradestationsalutes/
"A $0.45 per contract fee will apply for unbundled futures/futures options contract."
I realize that their normal commission in other offers of this platform is $0.65 (IRA), $1.20 (tiered) or $1.50 (standard) including platform and routing, but the fact that they can offer it to armed forces retired at $0.45 suggests to me that that is their real bottom line.
Also I think their intra-day margining may be better than others because I think it is pure real-time SPAN without these leg-counting exercises that others use.
Even if you cannot get the TradeStation white-label version, it might be favorable to use TradeStation Clearing with the original version of CityTrader that you already have.
ADM is not a good choice for a small retail account. They have a free platfrom called OAK, but they charge high commissions for smaller account vs other FCMs. They cater to larger accounts that want their balance sheet. We introduce to Wedbush. With permission from Wedbush, this is possible because neither WebICE or CME Direct are margin based. The FCM sets risk with a limit of Max order size and Max position size.
Bob
In my opinion, OAK along with the ADMIS
Do you introduce to ADM? Equities also? What sort of minimum account size? Do they offer portfolio margin? Thanks.
We have no problem setting up the Options side with TradeStation. You are right, they use CityTrader for the Options side.
In my opinion, OAK along with the ADMIS portal could be a very good solution for Options traders.
The portal provides "What If" scenario that would show you the impact of Options on your margins.
The cost we provide would match standard retail rates applicable to the level of RT.
I think that no one can say that one solution is better than another. Every trader has specific needs that need to be matched accordingly. Sometimes they are very subtle differences.
Yes it definitely could be for some futures options traders, with its free platform (that may not include options though). I did try to look at it on the web, but I do not see any indication it has RFQ's/ UDS's. Without that it would be unusable for me because I trade options butterflies etc., for which you need those.