Quote from Brandonf:
I lost money over and over and over again until I accepted the fact that the markets are mostly random. In the end what it comes down to is this, the markets are a lot more random than most traders hope they are or want to believe they are, but at the same time the markets are also not as random as an academic would have you think. The trick is to understand the most of the action is random, and get yourself involved in the siutation where the randomness is not involved.
My question does not imply that I believe in non-random markets. I was merely trying to question his initial hypothesis.
To list the ways to profit from randomness, you must first assume the market is random. What if the market is non-random; or alternates between random and non-random periods ? Then all the methods you derive based on the initial assumption are essentially flawed.