We're actually conflating two related but different concepts at this point. The extent to which trade is denominated in dollars is a different thing than the amount of foreign reserves that are denominated in dollars. I think when most people refer to "reserve currency" they're talking about the latter, while you're talking about the former.A nice post reasonably argued. However it underestimates the rate at which the dollar is losing it's status as the reserve currency. Each year the dollar plays a slightly smaller role in international trade. The dollar is still the major reserve currency, but time is not on it's side. More and more international trade involves pricing in other currencies. This tendency was inevitable in 1944, as Keynes pointed out in 1944. It is still inevitable today. Already the dollar is just one of the "reserve currencies". What comes next? And when?
They are of course linked. The reason Central Banks have so much in dollar denominated reserves is because so much trade has been carried out in collars. They can use these reserves to both facilitate foreign exchange and to manipulate the currency market to maintain (or try to maintain) a favorable exchange rate for their own currency relative to the Dollar.We're actually conflating two related but different concepts at this point. The extent to which trade is denominated in dollars is a different thing than the amount of foreign reserves that are denominated in dollars. I think when most people refer to "reserve currency" they're talking about the latter, while you're talking about the former.
What a joke. It is if central bankers know a good rate is for their country beyond the next 24 hours. They know less than you.to manipulate the currency market to maintain (or try to maintain) a favorable exchange rate for their own currency to the Dollar.
Thank you so much!They know less than you.

That.....
I think trust in the US will continue to erode but it's still the prettiest girl at the dance by far.
...