USA! USA! USA! Winning the coronavirus race

But it was mostly on Trump and his unwillingness to lock down, so stop diverting the blame. Had he closed down 2-3 weeks earlier and with obligatory mask wearing, we could have saved half of the deceased.

Not trying to endorse Trump's policies, but Trump likely didn't have the authority to order a national lockdown according to
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/national-lockdown-quarantine-president-powers/
But does the president have the constitutional and statutory authority to issue some form of a national lockdown, similar to what has been done in Italy? It's not likely he does, constitutional experts say.

There's not a federal lockdown authority or anything like that, or a federal quarantine authority," said Ilya Shapiro, director of the Robert A. Levy Center for Constitutional Studies at the Cato Institute and legal consultant for CBS News.

"A national lockdown, I think, is pretty far out of bounds for the president," said Keith Whittington, William Nelson Cromwell professor of politics at Princeton University's Department of Politics and an expert in constitutional interpretation.
 
but Trump likely didn't have the authority to order a national lockdown

That is correct, but it is all about the attitude. If he puts on a red MAGA mask so will most of the South. If he agrees with the lockdown, the Rep governors will order a lockdown. If he says release 20K ventilators should be released and spread from the national stockpile, the states get 20K ventilators.

That simple...

But he is an incompetent pussy who wanted the stockmarket to soar to new highs.
 
Good job letting "the most powerful man on the planet" off the hook - for his sheer incompetence, grandstanding and idiotic medical advice.

The sad part...they can still get their act together.

Yet, with the poor leadership and no national mandate and he didn't enact that law (I can't remember the name of it) that would essentially force certain business to mass produce PPE, testing kits and military medical personnel to distribute such in each state if needed.

This will only get worst before it gets better in comparison with the leaders of other countries that are more competent and now reopening their borders while at the same time telling Americans to stay away (don't visit us).

wrbtrader
 
1. Interestingly, most neighbor to China countries didn't believe them and locked down anyway. I also assume we have spies there so even though they lied, it is on us not on them.
Seriously, who believes anything what China/Russia/USA says?

2. I agree here but kind of the same agreement like in #1 applies. Don't we have people in the WHO who told us otherwise?

3. Although their lie is understandable, but not necessary acceptable. They could have taught us how to make a home-made mask, like they eventually did. Not increbibly imaginative.

But it was mostly on Trump and his unwillingness to lock down, so stop diverting the blame. Had he closed down 2-3 weeks earlier and with obligatory mask wearing, we could have saved half of the deceased.

He basically wasted a full month golfing...Even just getting the supplies (without lockdown) would have saved lives.

"I asked Xi, he was extremely strong and powerful in his denial"
 
Yet, with the poor leadership and no national mandate and he didn't enact that law (I can't remember the name of it) that would essentially force certain business to mass produce PPE

It might have been a bit late, but Trump did invoke the Defense Production Act.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/sergei...cal-supplies-under-the-defense-production-act
Apr 8, 2020
...
In a statement on Friday, 3M responded to Trump invoking the Defense Production Act: The Minnesota-based company said they would supply the federal government with the N95 masks they need
 
Total cases per 1 million inhabitants in decending order. High number is bad result, low number is good result.
USA in 12th place. Worst numbers from the Western world.

total cases.jpg
 
Last edited:
Numbers of tested people per 1 million inhabitants in decending order. High number is good result, low number is bad result.

USA in 23th position. According to Trump the US has the highest numer of tested people in the world. Fake news, like so many times.

test.jpg
 
Numbers of tested people per 1 million inhabitants in decending order. High number is bad result, low number is good result.

USA in 9th position.

deaths.jpg
 
Total cases per 1 million inhabitants in decending order. High number is bad result, low number is good result.
USA in 12th place. Worst numbers from the Western world.

View attachment 235048
Numbers of tested people per 1 million inhabitants in decending order. High number is good result, low number is bad result.

USA in 23th position. According to Trump the US has the highest numer of tested people in the world. Fake news, like so many times.

View attachment 235049
Numbers of tested people per 1 million inhabitants in decending order. High number is bad result, low number is good result.

USA in 9th position.

View attachment 235050
no worries; that's gonna get fixed real good:
The Trump administration ordered hospitals to bypass the C.D.C. and send key virus information to a Washington database, alarming health officials.
Tuesday, July 14, 2020 3:22 PM EST
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/14/world/coronavirus-updates.html#link-47bd459f
  • From now on, the Department of Health and Human Services will collect information on patients, available beds and more data.

  • Critics fear the administration’s new system could be open to political distortion.
The Trump administration has ordered hospitals to bypass the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and, beginning on Wednesday, send all coronavirus patient information to a central database in Washington — a move that has alarmed public health experts who fear the data will be distorted for political gain.

The new instructions are contained in a little-noticed document posted this week on the Department of Health and Human Services’ website, Sheryl Gay Stolberg reports. From now on, H.H.S., and not the C.D.C., will collect daily reports about the patients that each hospital is treating, how many beds and ventilators are available, and other information vital to tracking the pandemic.

Officials said the change should help ease data gathering and assist the White House coronavirus task force in allocating scarce supplies like personal protective gear and the drug remdesivir.

Hospital officials want to streamline reporting, saying it will relieve them from responding to requests from multiple federal agencies, though some say the C.D.C. — an agency that prizes its scientific independency — should be in charge of gathering the information.

“The C.D.C. is the right agency to be at the forefront of collecting the data,” said Dr. Bala Hota, the chief analytics officer at Rush University Medical Center in Chicago.

Public health experts have long expressed concerns that the administration is politicizing science and undermining the disease control centers; four former C.D.C. directors, spanning both Republican and Democratic administrations, said as much in an opinion piece published Tuesday in The Washington Post. The data collection shift reinforced those fears.

“Centralizing control of all data under the umbrella of an inherently political apparatus is dangerous and breeds distrust,” said Nicole Lurie, who served as assistant secretary for preparedness and response under former President Barack Obama. “It appears to cut off the ability of agencies like C.D.C. to do its basic job.”

The shift grew out of a tense conference call several weeks ago between hospital executives and Dr. Deborah L. Birx, the White House coronavirus response coordinator.

After Dr. Birx complained that hospitals were not adequately reporting their data, she convened a working group of government and hospital officials who devised the new plan, according to Janis Orlowski, chief health care officer of the Association of American Medical Colleges, who participated.

But news of the change came as a shock inside the C.D.C., which has long been responsible for gathering public health data, according to two officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss it. A spokesman for the disease control centers referred questions to the Department of Health and Human Services, which has not responded to a request for comment.

The dispute exposes the vast gaps in the government’s ability to collect and manage health data — an antiquated system at best, experts say.
 
Back
Top