USA cadet wears hijab with military uniform

You don't know any of this any more than if you know a guy with a confederate flag on his truck bumper is lynching "blacks".

If she's proven herself through vetting, training, testing, and success, and is ready, willing, and able to do the job, following her standing and given orders, then you have nothing to add.

I do know that by wearing a hijab she shows that she believes in the retarded and backward values of islam. That's the bottom line. Further I support the separation of state and church, which is one of the foundations of Western democracies. Therefore government employees should refrain from displaying religious symbols when on duty, in fact they should be forbidden to do so.
 
Last edited:
Wearing some religious symbol seems innocuous and makes us feel good about ourselves. Look how tolerant we are.

In dealing with islam however, it is important to apply a reciprocity test. Does Saudi Arabia allow our troops in the Kingdom to display religious symbols, eg chaplains? No. They have to remove them. Can our troops bring in Bibles? No. Bibles are strictly forbidden in the cradle of islam. Can Christians or Jews open their own churches there? No, of course not. Tolerance is respected in islam only when it advances islam.

When we do allow our troops to display divided loyalties by signaling their adherence to a belief system that is antithetical to our own, we start down a slippery slope, albeit one that has been well-traveled. Next we get demands for special accommodations for their prayer practices. Then special food. Then they cannot serve in units with mixed sexes or jews. Then they want units that are only muslims, and when you do that, then you have to divide them between sunni and shia, otherwise there will be trouble. Then they will not do anything that is perceived as hostile to other muslims, who after all, are our principal enemy.

It sounds harsh to PC-conditioned ears, but the far better course is to give muslims a choice. If you want to serve in our military, you assimilate and adopt our values. Otherwise, no thanks.
 
Wearing some religious symbol seems innocuous and makes us feel good about ourselves. Look how tolerant we are.

In dealing with islam however, it is important to apply a reciprocity test. Does Saudi Arabia allow our troops in the Kingdom to display religious symbols, eg chaplains? No. They have to remove them. Can our troops bring in Bibles? No. Bibles are strictly forbidden in the cradle of islam. Can Christians or Jews open their own churches there? No, of course not. Tolerance is respected in islam only when it advances islam.

When we do allow our troops to display divided loyalties by signaling their adherence to a belief system that is antithetical to our own, we start down a slippery slope, albeit one that has been well-traveled. Next we get demands for special accommodations for their prayer practices. Then special food. Then they cannot serve in units with mixed sexes or jews. Then they want units that are only muslims, and when you do that, then you have to divide them between sunni and shia, otherwise there will be trouble. Then they will not do anything that is perceived as hostile to other muslims, who after all, are our principal enemy.

It sounds harsh to PC-conditioned ears, but the far better course is to give muslims a choice. If you want to serve in our military, you assimilate and adopt our values. Otherwise, no thanks.

The problem with muslims however is that islam allows them to lie even under oath if that serves the purposes of islam, this is called taqiyya.
 
I do know that by wearing a hijab she shows that she believes in the retarded and backward values of islam.
You're in a hate cycle. Some Muslim are, too. It's a source of energy, we need that, but there are better sources.
 
give muslims a choice. If you want to serve in our military, you assimilate and adopt our values. Otherwise, no thanks.

Same choice they should have for even living in America. If they don't want to adopt American values and assimilate into American culture, then STAY THE FUCK OUT!!

It "had" always been our immigration way... immigrants were welcomed into America to become "American"... accept our culture and blend with our society. NOT come here to (1) suck tit on our social welfare system at the expense of American tax payers and (2) set up your own little caliphate and expect us to accept and adapt to you.
 
Last edited:
You're in a hate cycle. Some Muslim are, too. It's a source of energy, we need that, but there are better sources.

Rational criticism doesn't equal hate. Maybe you feel hate for people with other views but I don't . This is really the core problem of having a discussion with a liberal. As soon as you disagree you get accused of hate, raciscm et all and insulted. It's just impossibe to have a civlized discussion based on arguments with you lot.
 
Last edited:
Rational criticism doesn't equal hate. Maybe you feel hate for people with other views but I don't .

Who said anything about hating anyone? Acknowledging someone "doesn't fit in... and especially by their own choice"... and if so everyone would be better off if they went elsewhere... has noting to do with "hate".
 
Who said anything about hating anyone? Acknowledging someone "doesn't fit in... and especially by their own choice"... and if so everyone would be better off if they went elsewhere... has noting to do with "hate".

For some strange reason all those righteous, civilized, healthy and well-educated people from Africa and the ME leave their prosperous homelands behind and risk their lives to come the West and live among white racists. I know I wouldn't want to live among people who hate me, but they apparently do.
 
For some strange reason all those righteous, civilized, healthy and well-educated people from Africa and the ME leave their prosperous homelands behind and risk their lives to come the West and live among white racists. I know I wouldn't want to live among people who hate me, but they apparently do.

I wonder how many fewer of them there would be if we didn't have generous social welfare support? You think they'd uproot and travel halfway across the globe just for the "climate"?
 
Back
Top