Can someone please explain in very simple terms, what is the argument all about? I miss the point, why did this even go to SC. Just simply include the question and moved on. Am I missing something?
The constitution is very clear in that the census is to count residents, not citizens, for apportionment.
This is a critical constitutional issue as the census is used by government and private business in virtually every area related to commerce, education, health and safety, etc. Decreasing the accuracy is a detriment to our national wellbeing.
The constitution is very clear in that the census is to count residents, not citizens, for apportionment.
This is a critical constitutional issue as the census is used by government and private business in virtually every area related to commerce, education, health and safety, etc. Decreasing the accuracy is a detriment to our national wellbeing.
I know you right wingers are thinking this is a good thing for whatever reason but it is not. We want an accurate count.
Still not following, people are still being counted, it is just another question. For example, do you have any gray hair? Who will it impact in overall census count?