Now that is hilarious! I've never understood the logic behind using metals as a medium of exchange in a survival situation.
I don't think there's any logic to it. It's a fantasy associated with the idea that the US Treasury "never should have gone off the gold standard," i.e., that US currency
should, as a matter of law or economic policy, be backed by physical gold reserves.
When you couple that idea with the notion that currency
could,
in theory, become essentially worthless (e.g., hyperinflation, nuclear war, etc.), it's not a huge leap to think that gold or silver could somehow "replace" government-issued currency.
But I've never heard a coherent explanation of why people who have
things that people want, such as food, clothing and medicine, would trade those things for gold or silver. They would be more likely to want to trade for
other things, i.e., direct bartering, without money.
BMK