Quote from darkhorse:
any of you guys remember a poster named vladiator- spent a lot of time defending efficient market theory(!) and socialism as a viable economic model(!!)?
the mind blowing arrogance, jargon laden nonsense and obsequious academia worship bears an incredibly striking resemblance... don't see that combo too often.
vlad, is that you?
Quote from vladiator:
Came back to ET after about 6 months of inactivity, ran a search for my handle and see some still remember me. Thanks. No, it was not me, and I'm not sure if I'd agree - I have to go back and read what was said. But yes, I did fight for EMH and yes, I do believe socialism rules.![]()
Take care.
PS as for "academia worship", I think you are wrong there. I appreciate the tools my PhD gave me and the level of understanding, but I've always been about the application of such knowledge which is foreign to many in academia.
. You do have a point that it may not work flawlessly in its extreme form. But in reality it's more like a specturm and I think the US would be a lot better off if it had more of socialism in the mix (it already has quite a bit, by the way, for those who aren't aware of this fact.)Quote from oddiduro:
Vlad,
I don't normally highjack threads, but I have to STRONGLY assert that socialism is a failed attempt to equalize things that cannot be brought into equilibrium, namely, human potential.
Can you cite ONE example where this has even romotely worked in ANY non-agricultural society in ANY time in HISTORY.
I anxiously await your response![]()
Regards
Oddi
Quote from citizennobody:
What house of cards are you talking about? Are you talking about your theory on inflation? I hope you are, because your view of gold as a standard of value for our fiat currency is about as well thought out of theory as people who buy investments because they are recommended in Forbes. Gold only has the value that we give it, the standard could just as easily been a diamond, or ruby, or silver, or even a cow pattie relation.
Do you really think that the whole world will be prevented from self-destructing on a gold standard? Last I remember, we went through numerous wars, plagues, etc, and the great depression on the gold standard. You shouldn't have fallen asleep in your Intro to Macroeconomics class at Bunker Hill Community College because then you would understand the difference between controlling our internal balances (Unemployment, Msupply, fiscal deficits, etc.) VS external balances (current & capital accounts, etc) on a gold standard VS a fiat currency (ie floating exchange rates).
I also hope that you are not using this as a rationalization for investment in gold either, because fundamental analysis alone of a market traded vehicle is not a rote process or else we all would be rich....!