Urgent Message From Rennick

Yep - ok. . .now I need some help from all you intra-day TA freaks.

Gimme approximate targets for ES,NQ,YM,ER2,EMD to add on the first bounce, please.

Thanks in advance.

gA aka Ps

OH! and if you absolutely don't know how to make the "BALL" work for you...simply cover your short NOW with a profit and bask the rest of the day knowing you were "RIGHT"!!

(now that can't be so hard - even for the knuckleheads;)


:D :D :D :D
 
Why are the "gurus" putting me on ignore?

ok so I added ES at 1309 with a +4 stop. YEP! - so try again at 1316 with (again) a +4 stop.

and ER2 at 709 with a +2 stop? YEP! - so try again at 712 with (again) a +2 stop.

and NQ at 1911.

gA

After all the "AMAZING" one said "sell any rallies".

(But I reserve the right to keep some hot tar around the side of the barn, lol!)

I don't see any (near) support for NQ, RUT & MID - perhaps there was some with SP & Dow that provided big bounce (novice scalper).
 
ES just rallied to 1322, hitting the 200 MA and bouncing off. According to The Ball, this would be the short entry. We'll see......
 
Correct call:
Quote from Mr. Rowshan:

ps Even though the S&P futures are -8 pts, i'm still calling for an up close.
More...
Incorrect call:
Quote from William Rennick:

TUES. 6/24 9:55am dow -64

The mighty "Ball" is NEGATIVE calling for WEAK Market action this morning. EXPECT MORE DOWNSIDE, SELL ANY RALLY ATTEMPTS...
More...
rendick, lifting someone elses call is bad enough, but being so wrong to boot is plain old embarrassing.
 
Quote from paysense:

I don't see any (near) support for NQ, RUT & MID - perhaps there was some with SP & Dow that provided big bounce (novice scalper).
More...

The 1304 SPX level was roughly 67 handles off of the last high.

This equals the first move down off the 1440 high down to 1373.

67=67
 
Quote from Landis82:

The 1304 SPX level was roughly 67 handles off of the last high.

This equals the first move down off the 1440 high down to 1373.

67=67
More...
Can you please show us the post you made on ET BEFORE the fact where you pointed this out waggie?
 
Quote from Mr. Rowshan:

Correct call:

Incorrect call:

rendick, lifting someone elses call is bad enough, but being so wrong to boot is plain old embarrassing.
More...

LOL, here's hoping for your sake this ain't just a counter-trend rally. That tar pot is just simmering until 4 pm.:D
 
Quote from William Rennick:

LOL, here's hoping for your sake this ain't just a counter-trend rally. That tar pot is just simmering until 4 pm.:D
More...
Rendick, quite honestly, I have nothing against you. You like to banter, and so do I.

But the difference in our calls (besides one being right and the other being wrong) is that if I was the one who was worng, I would admit it like a man. I haven't really seen you stand up like a man when your call is incorrect. maybe i'm wrong, let's see.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top