Originally posted by vulture
What I find so humorous about all these self indulgent posters who constantly feel the need to mention they are Ivy League graduates is that if they had ever spent time at some of the better state universities, they would find a good number of equally intelligent and ambitious students...A good number of students are accepted at Ivy League schools but choose not to enroll for financial reasons...Heck, last I checked my alma mater is charging $35,000 per year...In the throes of the worst recession in the past 20 years, I would imagine alot of highly qualified students are opting for state schools were tuitions are more in line with the reality of affordability...
This is truly the most right on post I have read here (unless I REALLY want to be self indulgent and exclude my own

)
I mentioned they took me (an Ivy League school)...but that was as a grad student, and I just sort of backed into it...a long story. But I never finished those studies...I just get to say I went.
My son goes to a state school. He is on a scholarship, but if he weren't, the tuition is $1200 a year. My daughter is at Northwestern. MAJOR bone of contention between my wife and I. To me, it is an indulgence that really has little or no value. She wants to be a journalist, so that means grad school. Hope there is some money left for that. And when she finishes grad school, and gets a job as a cub reporter, or newscaster, or whatever in some 5th tier market like Bumf*ck North Dakota do I think they are going to ask or care where she went as an undergrad?
Hell, I don't know why I am making this response. It is so off the subject of trading. But I am crazed that I feel I am unnecessarily pissing away 40k a year for the "prestige" of a name brand university. My son, who is at U of Florida is going to get just as good an education for free. You get out of college what you put in. Sorry for this rant. But it struck a nerve with me. The economy sucks, my income is down, my expenses are up, the market is tough for us all. So VULTURE, I owe you for setting things straight. But hell, why did you have to strike this nerve and get me wound up?
I should not submit this post. But I guess I will push the button, because like you, I am offended when I hear that a trader thinks their Ivy League backround makes them more qualified. Know what I studied? Mass communications. Yeah, really paid off in my trading career. NOT!!! Hell, I didn't even know what the stock market was when I was in college. (ok, maybe I did have some vague idea, but I certainly had no interest in it)
I don't mean to berate a superior education. But anyone who thinks that an Ivy League education is going to be of any benefit to a trader (not a fund manager.....I mean guys like us) is badly misled at best. I would feel more confident if I needed surgery and my doctor went to Harved Med. If I was in deep legal trouble, I would probably want a Yale lawyer... but if I were to start a trading firm, I would go to a poker room and look to recruit the strongest players. I can't think of any better place to start. At the risk of repeating myself, the best qualities for a trader (other than experience) are attitude, discipline, and the ability to get a good read on your opponents. To adapt to your adversaries. And believe me, the market is an adversary. The specialists in particular are adversaries that will deal from the bottom of the deck whenever they get the chance. I don't think they teach stuff like this at those eight schools. They don't even have good enough sports teams to interest anyone in looking for an edge in the spreads. Well at least not since the days of Bill Bradley. And old as I am, he was before even my time! Did love him on the Knicks though
Again, sorry for the rant. I promise to be a good boy and never do this again
