Unmasking Obama

Quote from OPTIONAL777:

Every bad president lowers the bar of expectations...

Every scandal in which a president does not have to take responsibility (Reagan's "I forget" or Clinton's "I did not with that woman" or Bush's I " Iraq has weapons of mass destruction" or Bush 41's "Read my lips, no new taxes") lowers the bar and people accept less and less qualified presidents and presidential candidates...

The standards have been lowered so much, Americans have put up with so much image over substance, that we get crappy presidents who the masses can blame for all their own problems...

People continually blame the "government" but no government I have ever seen in America wasn't voted in by the ignorant people of America...

People put partisanship over the quality of the people they vote for, which leads us to swings of the pendulum and idiot no substance presidents who look good on camera, but are empty suits, B list Hollywood actors, a wimp like Bush 41, his idiot kid, the lies of Clinton, and now the inexperience of Obama...

No, I did not vote for Obama and was one of his biggest critics in this forum during the primaries.

After the idiot repubs put up old man McCain, there was no reasonable choice but to vote for a man who upon dying wouldn't leave that idiot bitch Palin as president...

Have you been drinking? The last time I saw honest analysis like this from you was never.
 
Quote from trendlover:

...But it is ok for Sarah Palin to be no one knows her, to everyone knows her only because she is chosen by McCain for VP to have the religious right vote? Now everyone know who she is. No VP for her, BUT she use that media attention and quit her job governor to exploit that fame the media make for her... Her book is so soon. Why? Because if too much time go by, people forget her, so she goes very fast to make the book publish while she is still popular. And she has help to write that book fast to make money while she is popular still...

Geezus, where are the grammar Nazi's when you need them?
 
Quote from trendlover:

You saying Obama is fake with his book? Someone wrote that for him? But it is ok for Sarah Palin to be no one knows her, to everyone knows her only because she is chosen by McCain for VP to have the religious right vote? Now everyone know who she is. No VP for her, BUT she use that media attention and quit her job governor to exploit that fame the media make for her. Money is her motivation, ok. Her book is so soon. Why? Because if too much time go by, people forget her, so she goes very fast to make the book publish while she is still popular. And she has help to write that book fast to make money while she is popular still. This is for the good of the Alaska people, and for god, or good for Sarah Palin pocket? So sad people believe her talk of all is for god and people. Those people are good people who believe her lies. You think Sarah Palin wrote the book with no help in so short of time?

How is it possible for something so simple to be so complicated for people to understand? This isn't about Obama using a ghostwriter.
 
Quote from IShopAtPublix:

Idiot there is a difference between introducing a point and using a point to draw attention to something. One is proactive one is reactive. I don't want to talk about Bush but if you are going to engage in flawed arguments I am forced to introduce info to that will "shake idiots up"

Hey helmet boy, how about you use Ayers as one of your introducing points?
 
Quote from NeoRio1:

Have you been drinking? The last time I saw honest analysis like this from you was never.

LOL. Was thinking the same thing. Had to do a double-take on the handle.
 
Quote from IShopAtPublix:

Were you dropped on your head as a child? During the campaign you can bring up anything you want, as soon as the guy assumes office, people need to forget Ayers, Jeremia Wright, etc and concentrate on Obama's decisions as president. Obama was better than McCain in november and I would make the very same choice now.

That would be true if we elected him to a life long term. But, as it is, he only has a few years until the next election. So it is very valid to consider these things now. And your statement is just wrong.
 
Is it valid when you hire someone to repeatedly look at their past performance and/or associations once they have taken the job and are working?

Not really. What matters is job performance once they get hired. People generally are not hired for a lifelong term, that is an exception...

No one cares what was done in the past, what matters is the present and the future...



Quote from 151:

That would be true if we elected him to a life long term. But, as it is, he only has a few years until the next election. So it is very valid to consider these things now. And your statement is just wrong.
 
Quote from OPTIONAL777:

Is it valid when you hire someone to repeatedly look at their past performance and/or associations once they have taken the job and are working?

Not really. What matters is job performance once they get hired. People generally are not hired for a lifelong term, that is an exception...

No one cares what was done in the past, what matters is the present and the future...

Exactly right but some can't understand it. Jeremia Wright and Ayers are irrelevant now unless you are an imbecile.

Just as nobody cares about your middle school grades when you apply to college and your high school grades when you apply to grad school, you should not care about ayers and wright when thinking about Obama for 2012. His decisions count not his past.
 
Quote from IShopAtPublix:

Exactly right but some can't understand it. Jeremia Wright and Ayers are irrelevant now unless you are an imbecile.

Just as nobody cares about your middle school grades when you apply to college and your high school grades when you apply to grad school, you should not care about ayers and wright when thinking about Obama for 2012. His decisions count not his past.

You get better with age! The gems coming out of you are priceless.
 
Back
Top