Universal Trend Trading

luckyputanski · May 1, 2012

Quote from bwolinsky:

$500k to $200k is a 60% drawdown. In fact a $300,000 loss, so if you can't explain the fake equity curve you posted, that alone removes the legitimacy and premise of this thread, because that's not what I see here. I see a $300,000 loss and a 60% drawdown. You started at $500k, and now at $200k.

"Fake equity" - it's not fake, as much as it is a backtest of only S&P. Already explained that.

luckyputanski · May 1, 2012

Quote from alexvnew:

I'm sure I saw a post of yours where you claimed that your drawdown was 40%. Then obviously you either edited the post or had it removed. Regardless, this is not what is important here. You accused me first if you do not remember that. I was only trying to point to the fact that your drawdown was excessive and unreasonable by any standards. Then you said that your system can lose up to 70%. Obviously you are a psychologically unstable individual and you should seek help.

There is one post when I say I have 40% DD. Care to look what was my account value at the time?

2011 was bad for trend following, won't post a link here, but there is a blog that summarizes well known trend followers. Have a look. In 2011 I lost about 25%.

Yes, my system can have 70% drawdown. Are you claiming that I'm psychologically unstable because I can take more heat? If so - fine, if not - please explain.

luckyputanski · May 1, 2012

Quote from alexvnew:

Attention everyone!

Proof that luckyputanski is a disgusting liar.

Luckyputanski just claimed that he has been trading for 8 years. But this is what he claimed late last year:

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=229134&perpage=6&pagenumber=10

AND FINALLY HIS REAL PURPOSE IN ET IS REVEALED HERE:

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=229134&perpage=6&pagenumber=4

This grand loser wants to teach others how to lose 60% in 8 months and he goes around throwing accusations because he wants to be left alone doing his sh*t all over ET.

Yes, 2004 - first account, lost money with neuimex, learning for about 4 years.
September 2008 - opened account with decent starting balance, money that would hurt if I lost. Verifiable track record from September 2008. Do you see how my learning period is not relevant to the thread in the first link?
Teaching - yes, I teach people how to trade. At every class I show them my account, so they know I'm profitable. Unfortunately, people from ET are not my prospective customers - my course is in Polish.
I see you went to great lengths to try to discredit me. Sorry it didn't work. Now, are you going to open your journal or not?

bwolinsky · May 1, 2012

Quote from luckyputanski:

"Fake equity" - it's not fake, as much as it is a backtest of only S&P. Already explained that.

The curve does not match the magnitude of the loss.

Your journal starts at $500,000 and goes to $200,000. This is not reflected in the equity curve you posted.

luckyputanski · May 1, 2012

Quote from bwolinsky:

The curve does not match the magnitude of the loss.

Your journal starts at $500,000 and goes to $200,000. This is not reflected in the equity curve you posted.

Which one?

bwolinsky · May 1, 2012

Quote from luckyputanski:

I'll be trading a trend following method. Daily bars, following markets:
audusd, eurchf, eurgbp, eurjpy, eurusd, gbpjpy, gbpusd, usdcad, usdchf, usdjpy, gold, silver, copper, oil, wheat, s&p 500, nasdaq. Starting balance is 500 000.

Quote from luckyputanski:

Sold wheat @ 633.13

Account Value 220k

Quote from luckyputanski:

Bought DJIA @ 11973

Account Value 282k

Quote from luckyputanski:

Closed corn with loss -3385

Account Value 208k

The post from this one below where you misrepresent your actual results:

Quote from luckyputanski:

It has been working last 40 years on 25 different markets. It has been profitable on S&P last 223 years. It works on majority of stocks. It has been working on S&P 2000 - 2010. Thanks for your insight, but I will stick with my system.

Quote from luckyputanski:

Which one?

The SP chart from that post does not show a 60% drawdown, and you are misrepresenting your performance.

It doesn't get much more clueless than this, putanski. Thinking of asking EMG to add your seminar to list of scams.

luckyputanski · May 1, 2012

Quote from bwolinsky:

The SP chart from that post does not show a 60% drawdown, and you are misrepresenting your performance.

It doesn't get much more clueless than this, putanski. Thinking of asking EMG to add your seminar to list of scams.

Already said, that I trade more symbols (did you not notice?). The chart of S&P is backtest of S&P ONLY!!!
Got it now?

bwolinsky · May 1, 2012

Quote from luckyputanski:

Already said, that I trade more symbols (did you not notice?). The chart of S&P is backtest of S&P ONLY!!!
Got it now?

Whatever. Your -60% was your max drawdown approximately.

Nobody should pay you a dollar for your seminars. You're a terrible trader.

luckyputanski · May 1, 2012

Quote from bwolinsky:

Whatever. Your -60% was your max drawdown approximately.

Nobody should pay you a dollar for your seminars. You're a terrible trader.

Nobody pays me dollars for seminars

bwolinsky · May 1, 2012

Quote from luckyputanski:

Nobody pays me dollars for seminars

So euros? It's still overvalued and if you were truthful about your results they'd know beforehand it isn't worth it to pay anything.