Bought UsdJpy @ 80.52
Account Value 210k
Account Value 210k
Quote from luckyputanski:
Strongly disagree about "too much data". If I could I would be using 100 years of data for backtest, simply to make sure the strategy is robust.
Fell asleep.Quote from masterm1ne:
Have you read 'Trading in the Zone' by Mark Douglas?
That's simply not true.If you have lost more money on the last 20 trades than you have made, you dont have an edge.[/B]
Bla bla bla... Yes, "Trend following is dead". Again.Don't take my word for it... think about it. Every moment in the market is unique, new traders come in, old traders leave. Nothing is repeated 100%. Because of this uniqueness, I am pretty sure if you keep trading this mechanical thing, you will go to zero... Just like most mechanical systems they will break.
The people making money trading systems are doing HFT arb, have loads of quants/programmers, and have server collocation with the exchange.... They capitalize on fractions of a second and the programmers are constantly revising and monitoring their algos so that they don't lose. They don't have losing weeks.
That depends on your risk. I had bigger DD in backtest.You never will lose 50% if you truly have an edge.
Quote from masterm1ne:
It's a great falacy to think that a gigantic sample size will make your system more robust. I think this will actually make your real time results worse, because your system is more fit to the past, even though it's the only reliable guide to the future. Remember, there are many paradoxes in this business... that's why only 5% do it correctly.
Have you read 'Trading in the Zone' by Mark Douglas? There are many truths in the book you must come to grips with. If you have lost more money on the last 20 trades than you have made, you dont have an edge. Don't take my word for it... think about it. Every moment in the market is unique, new traders come in, old traders leave. Nothing is repeated 100%. Because of this uniqueness, I am pretty sure if you keep trading this mechanical thing, you will go to zero... Just like most mechanical systems they will break.
The people making money trading systems are doing HFT arb, have loads of quants/programmers, and have server collocation with the exchange.... They capitalize on fractions of a second and the programmers are constantly revising and monitoring their algos so that they don't lose. They don't have losing weeks.
The traders that amass fortunes trade descretionarily. You should trust me as I am in the -50%+ club as well currently. Look through my journal. I have seen what it's like to trade well. You never will lose 50% if you truly have an edge.
Quote from luckyputanski:
Fell asleep.
That's simply not true.
Bla bla bla... Yes, "Trend following is dead". Again.
That depends on your risk. I had bigger DD in backtest.
Quote from masterm1ne:
Never said TF is/was/willeverbe dead.
Quote from Handle123:
It might take me over 30 tries to find the top/bottom, but cause of options, not always a loss on overall position.
Everything is repeated 100%.
Everyone's "edge" has a different meaning.
I never got into any of the "mental" books, to me they explain why you are a loser, comes down to an enormous amount of work, very long hours and repeating same actions.
Quote from masterm1ne:
Not to mention you must have a price trend to make any money...
If you are comfortable attempting to catch bottoms by all means.... hedge with options and don't expect a high winning trade percentage.
Not sure about everything being repeated 100%. I guess it depends on what you are referring to and your perspective.
Of course edges are different for everyone. There are as many edges as there are traders.
You have to understand why you are a loser to become a winner.