Quote from IShopAtPublix:
There would be no "health care crisis" if it worked for the 95% of the population. People are finding it harder to understand how "in the greatest country in the world" fully employed individuals who are not bums could find it unaffordable to have access to basic health care.
I dispute that there is some huge number of people being denied access to basic health care. There are a lot of people who are young and healthy and choose to spend their money on other things. Everywhere I have lived has had county or city-provided basic health services for the poor, or in many cases, for anyone who wanted to use it.
I acknowledge that people can drop between the cracks when they change jobs or lose their coverage and then develop a condition, but that kind of problem can be addressed without destroying the entire system.
All I am saying is be careful what you wish for. When the government takes over health care, it is not going to spend the entire GDP on it. There will be rationing. People who get high quality care now may find themselves assigned to a que for things they take for granted, like MRI's. They may be denied lifesaving but expensive treatment because they are deemed too old or too risky.