United Flight Makes Woman Switch Seats After Pakistani Monks Complain

United Flight Makes Woman Switch Seats After Pakistani Monks Complain
"I thought I lived in a culture where females were equal to men."
9.30.2016



A Southern California woman experienced the dark side of multiculturalism during a United Airlines flight when the crew forced her to switch seats to appease the misogynistic leanings of two Pakistani monks.

From CBS Los Angeles:

Mary Campos said her pre-booked ticket was given away by United Airlines. The reason? She’s a woman, and two men didn’t want to sit next to a female.

A million-mile flier, Campos, a mom who lives in Coto de Caza, said she thought she’d seen it all - until a gate agent handed her a new boarding pass just before she got on a flight to Houston last Monday.

"He said, ‘This is your new seat,’" Campos said, "and I said, ‘Excuse me?’ And he said, ‘I don’t know how to tell you this.’"

The agent then told Campos that the two Pakistani men "have cultural beliefs that prevent them for sitting next to, talking to or communicating with females."

Since Campos doesn't come from a culture that (rightly) allows men and women to converse with each other, she found this outrageous, not because they held the belief, but because the American-based airline, hence the name "United," actually wanted to appease them.

"I thought I lived in a culture where females were equal to men," she said.

Campos lamented she had no choice but to take her seat assignment, prompting her to later write a letter of complaint to the CEO of United Airlines.

"What if I were handicapped or transgender?" she asked in the letter. "What if your entire flight crew were female? Any belief that prevents individuals from interacting with females should not travel on commercial aircraft."

United Airlines never responded to Campos until CBS Los Angeles picked up the story. They now apologize that she "was unhappy" with the situation.

"We regret that Ms. Campos was unhappy with the handling of the seat assignments on her flight," said a company spokesperson. "United holds our employees to the highest standards of professionalism and has zero tolerance for discrimination."

The Pakistani monks were allegedly "wearing long orange shirts" and "the female flight crew was not allowed to serve" them. Since Islam has no monastic orders, the two monks may have been some sect of Buddhism or Jainism.

Hey feminists, where you at?

http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/uni...n-switch-seats-after-pakistani-monks-complain
 
“”The immature rantings of Shapiro as a college student weren't something he grew out of. Instead, his dumbest beliefs were reinforced by a right-wing culture that nurtured every nutty idea he had, and pressured him never to stray from a far right ideology. As a result, Ben Shapiro has become a professional idiot.
—John K. Wilson[1]
Ben Shapiro (b. 1984) is one of the more visible and odious welfare recipients of the clogosphere— something of a second-rate, humorless Milo Yiannopoulos. He has written for Townhall.com and WND (which should tell you something right off the bat), but his real claim to fame was his close association with the late Andrew Breitbart, to the point where he was primary editor and then editor-at-large for Breitbart.com. Shapiro has since acrimoniously resigned from the site. Shapiro become more broadly popular among wingnuts for taking the pro-gun side in a "debate" with fellow leech Piers Morgan. Infamously, he has citedSesame Street as an example of liberal propaganda.[2]

Basically, Shapiro's entire shtick is to mewl about the persecution of conservatives in Hollywood and academia where "east/west coast elites" are hard at work, indoctrinating the unwitting public into communism. Shapiro is himself a UCLA and Harvard educated lawyer who lives in California, making him the very definition of a "west coast elite".

Ben and Breitbart were made for each other. They both take even the tiniest, most irrelevant morsel of "news"[3] and spin it into atrocities committed by the left. They both cry "Anti-Semitism!"[4][5] when confronted with facts, yet freely insert racist dog-whistles into their articles for effect.[6] They both earnestly use derogatory names like "SJW" and Marxist for anyone not on the far right. Ben has been caught a few times basing news articles on unsourced blogs, which later turned out to be false, yet never retracted them.[7][8] He tweets barely-literate screeds dozens of times per day.[9] Shapiro was the hero Breitbart.com needed, but maybe not the hero they deserved, as Breitbart.com and Ben split in rather dramatic fashion. When your webshite website has gone so far overboard that a bottom feeding wingnut like Shapiro resigns, it may be time for a little self-reflection.


http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Ben_Shapiro
 
since your team just gave away freedom speech rights on the internet I was wondering if they will force you to post something truthful at least one a year.


“”The immature rantings of Shapiro as a college student weren't something he grew out of. Instead, his dumbest beliefs were reinforced by a right-wing culture that nurtured every nutty idea he had, and pressured him never to stray from a far right ideology. As a result, Ben Shapiro has become a professional idiot.
—John K. Wilson[1]
Ben Shapiro (b. 1984) is one of the more visible and odious welfare recipients of the clogosphere— something of a second-rate, humorless Milo Yiannopoulos. He has written for Townhall.com and WND (which should tell you something right off the bat), but his real claim to fame was his close association with the late Andrew Breitbart, to the point where he was primary editor and then editor-at-large for Breitbart.com. Shapiro has since acrimoniously resigned from the site. Shapiro become more broadly popular among wingnuts for taking the pro-gun side in a "debate" with fellow leech Piers Morgan. Infamously, he has citedSesame Street as an example of liberal propaganda.[2]

Basically, Shapiro's entire shtick is to mewl about the persecution of conservatives in Hollywood and academia where "east/west coast elites" are hard at work, indoctrinating the unwitting public into communism. Shapiro is himself a UCLA and Harvard educated lawyer who lives in California, making him the very definition of a "west coast elite".

Ben and Breitbart were made for each other. They both take even the tiniest, most irrelevant morsel of "news"[3] and spin it into atrocities committed by the left. They both cry "Anti-Semitism!"[4][5] when confronted with facts, yet freely insert racist dog-whistles into their articles for effect.[6] They both earnestly use derogatory names like "SJW" and Marxist for anyone not on the far right. Ben has been caught a few times basing news articles on unsourced blogs, which later turned out to be false, yet never retracted them.[7][8] He tweets barely-literate screeds dozens of times per day.[9] Shapiro was the hero Breitbart.com needed, but maybe not the hero they deserved, as Breitbart.com and Ben split in rather dramatic fashion. When your webshite website has gone so far overboard that a bottom feeding wingnut like Shapiro resigns, it may be time for a little self-reflection.


http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Ben_Shapiro
 
Back
Top