United 93

will you be seeing this movie?

  • yes

    Votes: 12 41.4%
  • no

    Votes: 17 58.6%

  • Total voters
    29
Actually, once again, Whitster took you to school.
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

You have name calling down.

Next you could work on making a logical argument....

LOL...
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:
If the very thought doesn't move a person...

Oy Vey!
Quote from traderNik:
So the very thought of the attacks are enough to move you?
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:
The thought of the attacks don't move me, nor does most tragedy.
Hi Z, and thanks for the response. We are still waiting for some guidance re: some of the other assertions you have made in the past few months, but I'll leave that alone for now - I believe I have documented them pretty thoroughly.

You responded, but failed to answer my question. In the above we see you saying that the very thought of the attacks should be enough to move nitro - he shouldn't have to go and see the movie. But now you seem to be saying that the thought of the attacks doesn't move you, nor does the tragedy. If this is the case, why would you use the phrase 'Oy Vey!' to describe someone who is not moved by the thought of the tragedy?? This is very confusing to me.

Anyway, this is a side issue. The main question I have for you is this - how do you reconcile the surprise you evinced above, that anyone would need anything other than the knowledge of the fact of an atrocity to be moved by it, with the fact that you suggested a good joke would be to suggest that a fellow member's kids might be the subject of pedophilic attacks?

Any further clarifications would be appreciated.
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:
Acting on reason is the preferred method in my opinion.

There was too much emotional reaction following 911 ...

Hi Z

Just wanted to try to reconcile these statements with earlier statements you made regarding the origin of human life on earth. You have been quoted as saying that the earth is exactly 1,967,476,878 years old. When you were asked whether the actual number might be 1,967,476,877 years or 1,967,476,879 years, you responded by saying that the number you provided was the exact age.

Can you confirm that this claim was, in your opinion, an action based in reason? If so, could you provide the reasoning behind it? I find this somewhat difficult to understand.

Also, would you say that your joking suggestion that a fellow member should have it suggested to him that his children might be the subject of pedophilic attacks was an action based in 'reason'?

Thanks, Nik
 
Pabst the teacher and moderator, who makes posts like this:

Pabst
Moderator
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 4289

04-28-06 07:57 PM
Hitler With Tits? You're one sick fuckin' dude......



Quote from Pabst:

Actually, once again, Whitster took you to school.
 
Post links to quotes.


Quote from traderNik:

Hi Z

Just wanted to try to reconcile these statements with earlier statements you made regarding the origin of human life on earth. You have been quoted as saying that the earth is exactly 1,967,476,878 years old. When you were asked whether the actual number might be 1,967,476,877 years or 1,967,476,879 years, you responded by saying that the number you provided was the exact age.

Can you confirm that this claim was, in your opinion, an action based in reason? If so, could you provide the reasoning behind it? I find this somewhat difficult to understand.

Also, would you say that your joking suggestion that a fellow member should have it suggested to him that his children might be the subject of pedophilic attacks was an action based in 'reason'?

Thanks, Nik
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Post links to quotes.

Already have... many times. However, let's just start with the quotes from this thread - how about that. That should be easy enough. Let's deal with the 'age of the world' issue and it's relation to your assertions about the use of reason after that.

We await your response.
 
Response:

Post links to quotes.


Quote from traderNik:

Already have... many times. However, let's just start with the quotes from this thread - how about that. That should be easy enough. Let's deal with the 'age of the world' issue and it's relation to your assertions about the use of reason after that.

We await your response.
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Response:

Post links to quotes.

I'm not talking about the other threads - I am talking about your statements to nitro in this thread and my requests for clarifications, based on your subsequent comments regarding your preference for the use of 'reason'. How can I link you to a post that is in this thread itself??

Here, I'll try

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?threadid=68135

This is a link to this thread. This one, the one you are reading right now. Look at my posts 19, 6 and 5 before this one, respectively.

How's that?

We await your response.
 
Back
Top