Hedonically adjusted job numbers? I think you might be barking up the wrong tree here a bit...Quote from MKTrader:
Aside from the fact that gov't jobs numbers are hedonically-adjusted garbage that ignore too many things (like people who give up and stop looking for work), this is a horrible issue to campaign on.
Quote from Martinghoul:
Hedonically adjusted job numbers? I think you might be barking up the wrong tree here a bit...
True, but it's not like anyone's preventing you from seeing you all the numbers, from U1 to U6? BLS publishes them all... Moreover, you can see all sorts of other household survey details, if you so desire. So I don't really see the issue, tbh.Quote from MKTrader:
Okay, not enough coffee this morning and acronym soup got the best of me. CPI, NFP, BLS, BS. Yes, hedonics are an issue for CPI. Nonetheless, employment numbers have also gone through a litany of adjustments over the years (such as "discouraged workers"), and what we measure now isn't the same as what was measured in prior decades.
Quote from Martinghoul:
True, but it's not like anyone's preventing you from seeing you all the numbers, from U1 to U6? BLS publishes them all... Moreover, you can see all sorts of other household survey details, if you so desire. So I don't really see the issue, tbh.