Sorry not the same annotation from earlier...make sure I keep them from now ongood to see you back. what's your take on the $SPX going forward, any timeframe you like. Thx
above is post #67 of this thread... still got a long way to go XDDIm going to place a chart up showing the varies different levels that can form. Individual bar swap levels, groups of bars that swap, highs of bars that are showing a lower high form sell levels as well as higher lows demonstrate buy levels - it is not a trade - it just shows how to find levels
Im going to place a chart up showing the varies different levels that can form. Individual bar swap levels, groups of bars that swap, highs of bars that are showing a lower high form sell levels as well as higher lows demonstrate buy levels - it is not a trade - it just shows how to find levels

IMO, TA & PA both have this cultist following of people who somehow believe they've seen the light and need to share their born again beliefs to the rabble.
These cultists are stuck in a rut adamant their interpretation of bar by bar action or squiggly lines is the road to trading redemption.
This nonsense about every bar tells a story is typical religion, like the parables, 'an underlying reason' and lessons to be learnt.
You only need to look at some of the Al Brooks cultists to see they "truly believe" - while at the same time struggle with a gazillion posts about trading concepts, a whole heap of noise while treading water.
So on one side of the road is church of TA, other side of road is church of PA.
I'll remain a non believer, couldn't give a toss about beliefs, I have my quirky way of trading and just keep this to myself as it suits my personality.
Instead of making a big deal about terminology folks should have just taken the time to actually look at Erin’s charts. She defines “swap” terminology on her chart in her post #41. Look it up. I ain’t gonna tell it to you.

Conventional wisdom in trading is dominated by myths and fuzzy thinking. The phrases "more buyers than sellers" and "more sellers than buyers" are part of the CW explanation of why price goes up and down. For that reason, I did highlight this mistaken viewpoint.
Any person can espouse whatever viewpoint he or she has about trading and disseminate it online. There are various motivations for doing so. You have yours. I was motivated by the desire to state the obvious about supply and demand which apparently is not obvious to everyone.
Actually the name of the thread should have been Opening a can of worms. I anticipated that how we see buy and sell orders within the chart itself would be controversial. However I did not anticipate the reactions of members would be so strong. Baron has let me reactivate my membership to finish the thread. I have no agenda and nothing to sell. Its just an alternative view...or you can say an advanced view on supply and demand. I choose Technical Analysis as I felt this would be appropriate.
ErinThis thread is for the traders interested in reading a chart without using indicators or oscillators.