Understanding China's pettiness complex

I never attacked Chinese people unless they behaved in a way that is unreasonable and unacceptable. Chinese people in many ways and in many times are the victim of the regime that's currently in power in China so why would attack the Chinese people? It's you who need to read my posts which you never do.



That's a question that is irrelevant so it doesn't need to be explained as I have stated to you many times. The behaviour that China is exhibiting is s***, period! Whether it is the same as other dominant powers has done or not is irrelevant. Just because other people did s*** doesn't mean you can too as well. S*** is s***. I am going to have to copy and paste this for the future.

And besides, when other countries have done s***, they were condemned. China proclaims it's different from other countries well, with your statement, you have confirmed that it's not; China is behaving the same as other countries, then if other countries have been condemned, China would be condemned too which is what the world is starting to do right now. China shouldn't be crying that the world is "ganging up on China". It's doing exactly the same as other countries have done according to you, then it should be prepared to receive the same consequences as other countries.
You conveniently forget that all other dominant countries are still doing the same!
 
In the mid 1800s, 910K km sq of land were taken from China by Russia and that's 25X of Taiwan. The irony is that they are both friend now. :confused:
History is full of land disputes, thefts and trade. Border recognition and their inviolability is protected by UN Charter yet under constant pressure from those with separatist ambitions. The geopolitical chess game played by all powers leave a grey area of support for separatists or for nations protecting their borders. Some of the world's best known PR firms are paid millions to help groups spin their story for political and social backing.
 
China's approach is just the age-old tactic of carrot and stick. It has obviously been massively successful. Just look at how the EU refuses to criticize China in order not to jeopardize Germany's huge auto-industry investments. Or see how U.S. entities like the NBA and Hollywood rush head-on into domestic culture wars, dividing and weakening their own country, but would rather die than offend the Chinese regime.

If other people self-censor their criticism of you, that's a reflection of immense strength and power - not of weakness.

Part of me thinks this article is a 4D chess move by the CCP to encourage Western elites to discount China's true power, and the clear effectiveness of its simple diplomatic approach, by writing it off as "a reflection of insecurity". Much as China's boom in the 2010s was written off by Kyle Bass types as a castle built on sand which would eventually implode.

This is why we are decoupling from China which really should've happened lot earlier seeing the way things are going.
 
Last edited:
You conveniently forget that all other dominant countries are still doing the same!

and are still getting condemned. What's your point? It still does not justify China's abusive and bullying behaviour.
 
I do not know when ET becomes a political Reddit...

OTOH, economic systems are always captive to macro geopolitics.

When a large and clearly emotional adversary warns you of their intention for your complete demise in an extraordinary way, possibly that information could have value to you in in more than one way.

As a respectful student of Sun Tzu, I find that understanding the entire turf and positioning is everything when allocating capital and other decisions. (Even if the logical facts are unpleasant.)
 
I never attacked Chinese people unless they behaved in a way that is unreasonable and unacceptable. Chinese people in many ways and in many times are the victim of the regime that's currently in power in China so why would attack the Chinese people? It's you who need to read my posts which you never do.



That's a question that is irrelevant so it doesn't need to be explained as I have stated to you many times. The behaviour that China is exhibiting is s***, period! Whether it is the same as other dominant powers has done or not is irrelevant. Just because other people did s*** doesn't mean you can too as well. S*** is s***. I am going to have to copy and paste this for the future.

And besides, when other countries have done s***, they were condemned. China proclaims it's different from other countries well, with your statement, you have confirmed that it's not; China is behaving the same as other countries, then if other countries have been condemned, China would be condemned too which is what the world is starting to do right now. China shouldn't be crying that the world is "ganging up on China". It's doing exactly the same as other countries have done according to you, then it should be prepared to receive the same consequences as other countries.

All the shit coming out of your moth. Is this the American style?
 
Yeah that's obvious. You don't read and never try to understand what the other person's view is and just blurts out your own s***.

Your one more piece of sh*t out of your mouth. Sh*t does not make your strong. When sh*t keeps coming out of your mouth, you already lose your edge. And becomes worthless.
 
History is full of land disputes, thefts and trade. Border recognition and their inviolability is protected by UN Charter yet under constant pressure from those with separatist ambitions. The geopolitical chess game played by all powers leave a grey area of support for separatists or for nations protecting their borders. Some of the world's best known PR firms are paid millions to help groups spin their story for political and social backing.
Indeed. That how empires were created and destroyed.
 
Back
Top