but let me play devils advocate here....
if say I was to create an intangle product online such as say an online book that teaches people how to gamble...
and say some people buy it at first... then more people buy it and even more people buy it afterwards.... i may get away with targeting vulnerable people into an emotional gambling habit. Am I really helping society out in this case? probably not. Does a society with a variety of intellectual compacity for the most part know what to buy and what not to buy? If I pray on peoples weaknesses (which pretty much what most companies do) in order to narrow financial gain taken from a large amount of people compact into 1 individual, am I do society a favor?
Take for example, the richest people in the world. Sure they provide jobs for other people and they may seem like they're giving back to society, but the fact that they are cheap most of the time is pretty much a reflection of how they were able to attain more wealth to begin with.
For example, if you just got a very good deal on an item and sold it back on ebay and made a huge profit from doing this. Then you do it over and over again. Now when you walk into say a fast food restaurant and you see how all the employees slaving over a few $$$ per hour. Why is it that a sense of slight guilt comes over you... could it be that you are part of captialisim and you know that you are pretty much making more for the little that you are doing....which means, someone who has a lot of wealth has more potential to give back... yet is not really doing so, hence, the reason why they net 10's to 100 times more than the average worker. Which is causing the divide betwen the rich and the poor...
If you look at the economy, the US was flurishing in the past... I believe it was not out of the US being much smarter or had better morals, but after world war II... the US bombed a lot of major industrial factories in other countries which caused a monopoly for the US to prosper. Then society is lead to believe that the US business model is what causes the US to prosper. But now the playing field is even again and it is China that looks to dominate the economy soon.
If you look at those countries that have prospered were mostly countries we fought against. The agressive stayes at the top. It's survival of the fittest. In a democracy, those who want something tend to get it if they are hungry for it. A lot of people are hungry for it, but just aren't smart enough to know how to get it.
I see how greed can bring a countries social class up a few notches and then take the lower classes up with it...
but when thinking of a global economy... is capitalisim looking out for those who aren't capable of moving up the ladder due to limitations of resources? Hence, the reason why there are still third world countries and gaps between the rich and the poor?
Anyway, I am open to opinion and I open to the fact that I could be wrong about this... keep these posts coming.
if say I was to create an intangle product online such as say an online book that teaches people how to gamble...
and say some people buy it at first... then more people buy it and even more people buy it afterwards.... i may get away with targeting vulnerable people into an emotional gambling habit. Am I really helping society out in this case? probably not. Does a society with a variety of intellectual compacity for the most part know what to buy and what not to buy? If I pray on peoples weaknesses (which pretty much what most companies do) in order to narrow financial gain taken from a large amount of people compact into 1 individual, am I do society a favor?
Take for example, the richest people in the world. Sure they provide jobs for other people and they may seem like they're giving back to society, but the fact that they are cheap most of the time is pretty much a reflection of how they were able to attain more wealth to begin with.
For example, if you just got a very good deal on an item and sold it back on ebay and made a huge profit from doing this. Then you do it over and over again. Now when you walk into say a fast food restaurant and you see how all the employees slaving over a few $$$ per hour. Why is it that a sense of slight guilt comes over you... could it be that you are part of captialisim and you know that you are pretty much making more for the little that you are doing....which means, someone who has a lot of wealth has more potential to give back... yet is not really doing so, hence, the reason why they net 10's to 100 times more than the average worker. Which is causing the divide betwen the rich and the poor...
If you look at the economy, the US was flurishing in the past... I believe it was not out of the US being much smarter or had better morals, but after world war II... the US bombed a lot of major industrial factories in other countries which caused a monopoly for the US to prosper. Then society is lead to believe that the US business model is what causes the US to prosper. But now the playing field is even again and it is China that looks to dominate the economy soon.
If you look at those countries that have prospered were mostly countries we fought against. The agressive stayes at the top. It's survival of the fittest. In a democracy, those who want something tend to get it if they are hungry for it. A lot of people are hungry for it, but just aren't smart enough to know how to get it.
I see how greed can bring a countries social class up a few notches and then take the lower classes up with it...
but when thinking of a global economy... is capitalisim looking out for those who aren't capable of moving up the ladder due to limitations of resources? Hence, the reason why there are still third world countries and gaps between the rich and the poor?
Anyway, I am open to opinion and I open to the fact that I could be wrong about this... keep these posts coming.