A recount was launched earlier this week. He lost by 20,000 votes and recounts rarely amount to more then 200 changed votes. There is a far stronger chance that Arizona flips to Trump then he wins Wisconsin on a recount.
Uncompromising Men
- Thread starter Tsing Tao
- Start date
A recount was launched earlier this week. He lost by 20,000 votes and recounts rarely amount to more then 200 changed votes. There is a far stronger chance that Arizona flips to Trump then he wins Wisconsin on a recount.
After you've fired the Postmaster General and replaced him with an acting Postmaster who is a major stock holder in a U.S.P.S. Competitor Company, and also a major Republican campaign contributor, who then dismantles the U.S.P.S.'s mail handling apparatus prior to an election which will see the heaviest mail-in ballot participation in the Nation's history, it's absurd to demand that Ballots post marked by Nov. 3rd not be counted because they were delivered late. No legitimate Court would rule in favor of such an absurdity -- not even the bizarre U.S. Supreme Court. It won't happen.
Last edited:
Your post does not address the multiple fraud indications in Wisconsin. These fraud indications must be addressed. If there was a break in ballot chain of custody, or if fraudulent ballots were introduced oustside the view of the observers, how would they know?
It has been alleged that in some precincts in Wisconsin more votes were cast than registered voters. It is alleged that 86% of registered voters voted in the overall Wisconsin election. Considering normal statistical varience, some precincts would have turnouts lower than 86%. Therefore, by extension, some precincts would have an even higher percentage. Compounding this further still is the statistical history of Democrat supporters tending to vote less as a percentage of eligible voters compared to Republicans. If we compare turnouts in Wisconsin districts with non swing states, what would we find? We would find an exceptional statistical outlier that is suggestive of fraud.
However this indication of fraud happened, its cause must be investigated.
This is the dumbest thing you've posted all week. Gee, I wonder if Trump might motivate some voters to cast a vote ? Hell, some Republican supporters might have voted against Trump. The evidence suggests a ton of Americans who voted Republican for Senate or House voted against Trump for President.
You too are not addressing the statistically indications of fraud in the Wisconsin race. I go over this in my previous post. I would think and hope those on the Left would have enough confidence in the ballots as they have been presented and the security of the process to welcome the validation process. Unless, of course, it is the validation process is what Leftist are really concerned about. All the Left has do to avoid looking like they are attempting to steal an election is let the indications of fraud be investigated.
After all, which would you rather have: A illigitimate President or a legitimate one?
You claim my post is dumb without providing support. You think my claims are not supported by statistics? You want to look them up, or should I?
I must give you credit, you are improving. Usually, I have your ilk resorting to wanting their meme by now.
A recount was ordered. Why are you whining about this ? And why are you claiming a fraud occurred with no evidence at all ? It's not me with a problem here, it's you. Second of all, I'm not a "leftist". I share the common value system of most Canadians. We don't get into all this "left" vs "right" shit that's your hang up.