Uncompromising Men

[UsualName]

I presume you are responding to my post. You, with a quite a few other Leftist poster seem uncharacteristically uptight considering you guys said you’ve won. So uptight, you guys are often reading things into factual posts that just are not there.

From my post above:



What is hard to understand about this?

You’re not giving enough energy to the cause.

You ain’t MAGA unless you protest in front of a dildo emporium with a Trump flag yelling fraud at the local news.

 

[Nine_Ender]

The pattern of the progression in the tallying of the votes in Wisconsin was different than the other states. It was plain to see. As far as millions of others not detecting this indictator of fraud at about 4:00 am Eastern time, is it possible that most people were sleeping at this time during a weekday? Is it possible that only a handful, if that, except for me of course, kept track of the metrics I had available to me on paper? Additionallly, there is a electronic record of the progression of the votes in all states, some of which has been posted in this thread and or my “Possible Election Fraud in Progress” thread.

By the way, you saying there isn’t election fraud does not make it so.

Was is more interesting than the indicator of fraud I discovered is the lack of transparency concerning ensuring the integrity of the vote in Wisconsin. Further, partisan trolls has been seeming to work overtime in attempting to deflect legitimate concerns over various fraud indications. It is like it is more important to suppress discussion of that issue than taking the necessary steps to ensure no extra ballots or other method was used to fraudulently change the outcome in Wisconsin. I would have hoped for an above board effort to explain in reasonable detail the causes of the indicators of fraud in what should be the overriding concern to legitimize the election.

There will be a court battle. The outcome and remedies applied, if any, will be based on the evidence and the competence of the plaintiff.

If it were George Bush as the plaintiff instead of Donald Trump, Biden might as well as stay in his basement, assuming of course the multiple indications of fraud are actual fraud.

It's amazing how much you have dreamt an alternate reality then expanded on it in detail including claiming falsely that anyone who disagrees with you is "working overtime to deflect ... ". You asked for answers and the mistake many of us made was trying to explain what happened to you. Lesson learned. Back to basics. There was no fraud, there is no real evidence of fraud, if you want to waste your time pursuing the "fraud" go right ahead.

Feel free to get on here in a few months congratulating yourself when the "fraud" is outlined with evidence in the real world. That would free you up to find Big Foot and the mysterious dealings of the PPT team. Surely the PPT team is behind the recent run up in the Nasdaq .

 

[Nine_Ender]

You’re not giving enough energy to the cause.

You ain’t MAGA unless you protest in front of a dildo emporium with a Trump flag yelling fraud at the local news.

Certainly he should donate $10,000 to the Trump cause to pursue this fraud.

 

[UsualName]

Never forget Trump claims of steaming elections is not limited to democrats. Apparently, Ted Cruz is a cheater too:

 

[SunTrader]

I presume you are responding to my post. You, with a quite a few other Leftist poster seem uncharacteristically uptight considering you guys said you’ve won. So uptight, you guys are often reading things into factual posts that just are not there.

From my post above:

What is hard to understand about this?

Not a leftist or uptight at all but what I am besides, JOYFUL and a loose goosey conservative, is a realist and your posts are anything but factual.

Courts deal with facts and are dismissive of bogus accusations.

Newsflash that you seem not have gotten the last 4 years - a Chumpie tweet in particular or your living room observations are not facts.

 

[Tsing Tao]

So, it's Ok to ruin My Saturday

Briefly, Trump's campaign sued in Trial Court to be able to stand closer to the ballot canvassing in Philly. The trial court turned them down and ruled in favor of the election board that wanted to maintain a 20 foot distance for all observers (both parties by statute). The Trump folks appealed to the Commonwealth Court and got the low courts ruling reversed. The Appeals court ruled that observers could stand as close as 6 feet. The elections board then appealed the Commonwealth Court's decision to the State Supreme Court, hoping to get the Commonwealth court's decision over turned, and be able to retain their 20 foot distance requirement. Apparently the The State Supreme Court however ruled against the election board and upheld the Commonwealth court's decision or else the Supreme Court turned down the elction board's appeal. (We don't have here the decision from the Supreme Court, but it is well known the the elections board is being required to allow observers access up to 6 feet.) Regardless the reusult was that the Philly elections board was required to allow all observers (both parties) to stand as close as 6 feet from the counters. None of this ever had anything to do with GOP observers not being allowed to observe in preference to Democrat observers. Both parties and all candidates have observational access according to statute. The rules were, have always been, and remain the same for Democratic and Republican observers.

Can you think of any reason why observers shouldn't be able to stand within 6 feet of the counters?

 

[Tsing Tao]

Trumpers need to get over it. The rest of the country got over Chumpie a lifetime ago.

They did? Is that why people have been foaming at the mouth in rage over Trump for the last 4 years? Because they got over it a lifetime ago? Want some examples of prominent politicians and media figures who "got over it" a lifetime ago?

 

[piezoe]

Can you think of any reason why observers shouldn't be able to stand within 6 feet of the counters?

I think it was ultimately based on Covid considerations. However if you read the appeal on the Election Board to the Supreme Court you will come upon a litany of reasons the Election Board did not want the observors right on top of the workers while they were trying to do the ballot canvassing.

 

[Tsing Tao]

I think it was ultimately based on Covid considerations. However if you read the appeal on the Election Board to the Supreme Court you will come upon a litany of reasons the Election Board did not want the observors right on top of the workers while they were trying to do the ballot canvassing.

But if it is due to COVID, and 6 feet is the GACR (Generally Accepted Contagion Rule - with apologies to accountants everywhere) why was 20 feet the requirement?

 

[smallfil]

But if it is due to COVID, and 6 feet is the GACR (Generally Accepted Contagion Rule - with apologies to accountants everywhere) why was 20 feet the requirement?

That is so Republican poll watchers cannot observe the ballot counts properly including, noting defects in ballots from afar?