Uncompromising Men

There is no election fraud at this point. You have not one speck of evidence that there is. All you've done with your "anomalies" talk is point out that data analysis is not a skill you have. Even on a common sense level, everyone knew that Democrats preferred voting by mail and Republicans in person ( due in part to Trump's pre-election rhetoric that mail-in ballots were a fraud, despite the fact he himself has voted in that way in the past ).

The actual vote patterns are as one would expect, now that we know the mail-in ballots were counted last in numerous states.

The voting patterns are not what we would expect. Overall voter turnout rates over 86%, with some precincts allegedly showing 200% turnout rates? Reports of partisan election officials denying election observer access and actually physically blocking the view of the counting process? Biden getting created for more votes than were cast as shown by total voting percentage? This quick list of election fraud indications is not comphrensive. However, the issues I have mentioned, do you care to address them?

Fraud is determined by a court. There are multiple indications of possible fraud as shown several threads by several sources. I’ll remind you of my thread, “Possible Election Fraud in Progress”, as well as others that state the areas of concern along with support for those statements. More support than you typically give with your statements, by the way. In aggregate, this is ample probable cause, in my opinion, for an investigation into election related fraud involving multiple states. If election fraud is found in multiple states and there are either communications that show conspiracy or there is a similar pattern of fraud among several states, it may implicate national Democrat leadership. You certaintly have read the various posts outlining the supported indications of possible fraud, but You ignoring them will not make them go away in the minds of 60 million plus voters.

You seem so emotionally wound up now, it seems like you can’t reason and are unwilling to address the central issue at this point. The multiple, supported indications of election fraud.

Take a break, clear your head, and try to put yourself in our shoes if you want to understand what is going on in our minds. Imagine if our roles were reversed.
 
Perhaps they were collected, fraudulently filled out and submitted, no matching signatures or proof of identity required.
These possibilities predate this election, what is the frequency of the fraud problem before? And now, taking into account your sunk costs into Trump?
 
All mail in ballots require a witness signature.

Also you think it is that easy to get something notarized? I had to get a trust document notarized and that was a bitch to find one notary still doing that, imagine 20,000 people in a small area doing a mail in?

Wait, what? Mail in ballots require notarization?
 
These possibilities predate this election, what is the frequency of the fraud problem before? And now, taking into account your sunk costs into Trump?

You're absolutely correct. But nowhere near this scale.
 
You're absolutely correct. But nowhere near this scale.
The number of fraudulent ballots should rise with the number of total ballots. Has the frequency increased? Taking into account your (not yours) sunk emotional costs into Trump?
 
The number of fraudulent ballots should rise with the number of total ballots. Has the frequency increased? Taking into account your (not yours) sunk costs into Trump?

How can I say if the frequency increased?

All I can tell you is that a process that is not very good at identifying as to whether the person casting the vote is indeed the person who should be casting the vote went from 33 million in 2016 election to double that in 2020.

This is why I say the voting system is riddled with the potential for fraud.
 
Back
Top