2. I accept your apology, naturally.
I can compare the conflict of two children to the conflict between two adults with religion dominating their thinking. Very similar emotions are in play with both.....
3. Nothing but reason should be used as a political tool, but that's not what we see from either side.
4. An argument can be presented passionately for effect upon the audience, but a sound reasonable logical argument is never based on passion. Appeal to emotion often works well, but it is still a logical fallacy.
This is why so many people listen to Limbaugh and Hannity, Coulter and others butcher arguments logically, but find strong support as they are actually appealing to emotion, not reason.
To be fair, there on the left who do the same thing, but I do see people like Michael Moore and others at least admit that what they say is just their opinion, not an absolute truth.
I can compare the conflict of two children to the conflict between two adults with religion dominating their thinking. Very similar emotions are in play with both.....
3. Nothing but reason should be used as a political tool, but that's not what we see from either side.
4. An argument can be presented passionately for effect upon the audience, but a sound reasonable logical argument is never based on passion. Appeal to emotion often works well, but it is still a logical fallacy.
This is why so many people listen to Limbaugh and Hannity, Coulter and others butcher arguments logically, but find strong support as they are actually appealing to emotion, not reason.
To be fair, there on the left who do the same thing, but I do see people like Michael Moore and others at least admit that what they say is just their opinion, not an absolute truth.
Quote from GIDEONSPY:
2...My apology ---didnât meant to write that -----I was referring in comparing the action (which I donât agree) Jews and fundamentalist Arabs-----to comparing them is cloud judgment.
3.what?----terrorism should not be a political tool---ok----
4.i think you mistaken ---about removing emotions from the debate------if two civil and peaceful debaters ,nothing wrong with debating with emotion(with they didnât)-----so genocide and slavery debate---donât spark emotions?

