Police were on the streets, governor approved National Guard as well, what do you mean 'doing nothing', why do you have to make shit up?
Unarmed black man? Shoot 7 times in the back.Armed white kid? Give him some water.
- Thread starter exGOPer
- Start date
Police were on the streets, governor approved National Guard as well, what do you mean 'doing nothing', why do you have to make shit up?
Notice how the local Trumptard has nothing to say about the murders, pro life cuck are all about 'property' like they personally own it, but when people get murdered, it's completely ok to ignore.
I'm not making shit up. I've been watching a multistream of the protests since day 1. The police were too busy guarding the courthouse and were resource capped. I had a police scanner stream up too.
There were something like 250 national guard troops there. I'm not talking 250. I'm talking the full force of the United States Government deploying every available active duty national guard member to the town to enforce martial law. Deploy the DHS, FBI, and any other available combat ready units to assist as necessary.
You obviously haven't been watching the streams. Unfortunately, I can't stop. Martial law is the only thing that will stop this evil from leveling yet another town.
See murder usually means someone innocent was killed.
BLM rioters burning businesses and using concrete to seal buildings before setting them on fire are not innocent. Please stop. They set car lots on fire next to homes with people and pets inside them.
Seriously you're starting to sound like you support BLM's armed insurrection of the country. You sure you want to be posting that on the internet?
Hey! Let's spin this into a market argument! Would you rebuild your company in a town where violent insurrection is a possibility? Would you insure it (buy/sell options) on it? NO! That's why this is a problem! The only people effected are once again the middle class business owner minding their own business. Who buys their goods? The locals, that's who! Gonna suck real bad to have to drive 50 miles to the nearest walmart when no one will rebuild in your town. Their protests fall on deaf ears because it's a class war and not a war against police brutality. The exact people you need to support your cause as BLM, middle class white people, are repulsed when you burn businesses and loot. Imagine that!
Last edited:
Police were on the streets, National Guard was as well, what more do you want the governors to do here?
`
Imagine having such a pathetic existence.
Who said they were innocent? Police with deal with them, insurance will deal with the damage, public execution by 17 year old kids is not the solution.
Disarm any shooter at your own peril. If you are part of a mob with a history of condemning all shooters regardless of the circumstance, don't expect a militiaman to lay down his life's protection to mob rule. Doubtful the boy was standing anywhere alone. If he's with one or two others you can assume he's militia with a purpose and you won't be harmed unless you try to harm them. If in doubt, if you really don't know, it's really easy to back up a few steps and avoid trouble. He may be alone because his militia is more spread out. Everything about his last three shots speaks volumes about what probably happened before his first shot. Someone probably thought, "oh! Open carry. Open carry equals brandishing equals active shooter...i must disarm him now!". That wpuld not be justified, especially if video shows he is open carry, which is different from brandishing, which is different from shooting. Even when the kid was on the ground, he took the barrels aim off the third idiot that came running at him so as not to provoke by brandishing . But even though he started pointing at the ground, the white ally Biden voter came at him again. So I'm wondering why you are spinning the first encounter instead of providing footage.
Because I don't care enough to go looking, you do your own homework. The story is this incel was confronted for pointing his weapon at protesters and/or rioters and first victim threw something at him to fuck off for offering EMT help.....claims albeit likely disinformation of a molotov bottle.
See, not all of us believe that physical assault is defensible with deadly force so responding with deadly force to an item being tossed your way rings active/mass shooter alarms with plenty of people.
It matters if the boy is to be charged with any kind of murder. He clearly knows the difference between open carry, brandishing (pointing) and shooting (only shot at active attackers). He clearly gave the third idiot a chance to reconsider, having had no time to give the first two jackals to pounce the moment he tripped and fell to the street. Open carry, pointing at the ground, does not give you a right to throw a projectile . If you are part of a mob , and your projectile has the capacity to render unconscious, then it's especially deadly lethal especially if your target is alone without backup nearby. I would not shoot you if your projectile misses me, or even if it hits me and I remain conscious. But if your part of a mob and you make one more movement to come at me with your body or with another projectile, then you could justifiably go down for using , or trying to use lethal force on me. Probably this is how the first encounter went down. I'm sure you still don't care.
that's quite a cope you've concocted in your head
Then explain the inconsistency(s) in the logic if you can or if you dare. It should be easy for you, right?
