LOL @ simple minds on ET
They are like monkeys climbing a tree:
the higher they climb (more they post), the more ass they show
It has already been established that the large "admin expenses" were in relation to "employee benefit trusts" (EBT).
Last thing we need is for the usual ET rabble to discuss this with their usual half-assed, uninformed guesses
(ET = poor man's SeekingAlpha/ZeroHedge wannabe)
When the company's tax return was filed (most recently for the 2013 accounts) it is mandatory to disclose any tax shelters used.
Certainly a loss the size of GBP 40 MM or so would already have raised questions with the UK tax authorities - back then & up to now...
Thing is, in the global hunt for taxes, the tax authorities can always retrospectively plug the loopholes that were legit at the time
Whether a EBT is legal is a matter for the UK courts to decide, based on the individual circumstances of each case.
Certainly beyond the scope for the simple minds on ET
All the UK gov want from those who have used such structures is to quickly settle (no criminal charges) by way of an "amnesty":
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/employee-benefit-trusts-settlement-opportunity
If not they can fight the matter in court
All Sarao has to do is to pay up. Or fight the matter in court.
Getting his hands on sufficient ready cash after the DOJ case is finalized is another matter
LOL