UK trader arrested for May 2010 U.S. Stock market flash crash

Trader Tied to Flash Crash Says He Changed His Mind a Lot
Don't Miss Out —
Follow us on:
Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube
by Tom Schoenberg
6:27 PM BST April 23, 2015
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


488x-1.jpg

Excerpt of an email from Nav Sarao to Joanna Jasina included in the CFTC court filing.

Source: CFTC court filing


How 'Spoofing' Might Have Crashed the Market
A self-described insomniac, Navinder Singh Sarao railed against high-speed traders for corrupting financial markets and defended his own rapid-fire success as the benefit of a quick mind.

“I trade very large, but change my mind in a second,” wrote Sarao in a May 2014 e-mail to the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority before he was accused this week in the U.S. of contributing to the 2010 flash crash.

These new details, gleaned from pages of e-mails and documents released by U.S. authorities as part of their case against him, are at odds with the public profile that has so far emerged of the 36-year-old Londoner. He worked out of sight, sometimes from his parents’ suburban home, before his arrest this week and was described by one fellow trader as distant.


The Sarao revealed in court records is a squeaky wheel, well known to his brokers and software providers, who he harassed for not enabling him to trade as fast as he wanted. He corresponded, too, with regulators, including those who are now under scrutiny for not detecting earlier how his methods may have contributed to white-knuckled moments on May 6, 2010, when $1 trillion of value was briefly erased from U.S. stocks.

Market Intuition
In defending his propensity for submitting and then almost immediately canceling trades -- an allegation central to manipulation charges against him -- Sarao told regulators he relied on market intuition. The records also show the firms he worked with to lower his taxes and to run his business included banks in Switzerland and Dubai, and brokers at MF Global Holdings Ltd. and R.J. O’Brien & Associates.

Trading Technologies Inc. and Edge Financial Technologies Inc. are identified in the documents as the software providers that Sarao used to get an upper hand and to help him disguise his orders from high-frequency traders.

Sarao, who goes by Nav, also said his investing style was a reaction to speed traders, who he said could manipulate the market based on his orders without any repercussions. He said his software and his distance from Wall Street made his transactions “miles too slow” to compete with flash traders operating out of the U.S.

“I don’t like the HFT arena and have complained to the exchange numerous times about their manipulative practices, please BAN IT,” Sarao told the FCA in the May 2014 e-mail.

‘Using Mouse’
While high-frequency trading has no exact definition, it includes strategies such as using ultra-fast technology and placing computer servers close to exchanges to react to market data as quickly as possible.

Armed with computer algorithms, Sarao relied on some of those techniques, but he also told regulators he was old school. “To this day I am still using the mouse to trade,” he wrote in the e-mail to the FCA.

And if what regulators say about Sarao’s manipulation is true, some high-frequency traders could have been his victims.

The Justice Department and Commodity Futures Trading Commission said he engaged in spoofing, the practice of rapidly submitting fake orders and then withdrawing them to move prices to his benefit. Because spoofing typically happens in milliseconds, high-frequency trading firms are the most likely to be harmed.

“It sounds like the regulators came after him and he tried to deflect attention from himself on to high-frequency traders,” said Bill Harts, chief executive officer of HFT advocacy group Modern Markets Initiative. “I think that’s all we need to know about his credibility.”

‘Not Vanity’
Sarao, who said he started his one-man operation in July 2005, first cleared his transactions through MF Global, the now-defunct firm that was headed by Jon Corzine. After MF Global collapsed in 2011, he traded through Marex Spectron and Knight Execution & Clearing Services LLC before settling on Chicago-based R.J. O’Brien.

Spokesmen for Marex, Knight and MF Global, as well as the software providers either declined to comment or didn’t immediately return phone messages.

R.J. O’Brien cooperated with the investigation and “had no involvement whatsoever” with Sarao or his company at the time of the flash crash, Ellen Resnick, an outside spokeswoman, said in an e-mailed statement.

In 2007, Sarao wrote to the founder of the company that published Trader Monthly, asking how he might be included on their list of 30 distinguished traders under the age of 30. He told the publication he made between $45,000 and $133,000 each day.

“You must understand that for me to be in the top 30 is not a vanity thing,” Sarao wrote. He said that while he normally preferred a low profile he was looking to set up a new trading business and the publicity might help.

Stashed Profits
Sarao made $40 million manipulating futures tied to the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, including about $900,000 on the day of the flash crash, according to authorities. A CFTC investigator said most of Sarao’s profits were stashed in a variety of offshore vehicles and business ventures. One of his companies, based in Anguilla, had $17 million in a Swiss bank account, a document released by the CFTC shows.

At a bail hearing Wednesday, his lawyer said Sarao has 5 million pounds ($7.5 million) in trading accounts, 4.7 million pounds of which is a loan, and 100,000 pounds in “numerous betting accounts.”

While seeking explanations from brokers at R.J. O’Brien in October 2012 on why his system was so slow, Sarao’s frequent e-mails to two brokers throughout the weekend caused one to ask whether he ever slept.

“I normally can’t get to sleep before 4 a.m., which isn’t a problem because U.S. trading opens at 2:30 p.m. here,” Sarao responded in an e-mail sent at 2:51 a.m.

“I have made the majority of my net worth in, I would say, no more than 20 days of trading. That’s how I trade -- mostly I hardly work but when it’s volatile I have to work 12 hours a day,” he wrote.

A quick look at DOJ complaint against him does not tell me anything that can prove his trading methods directly caused the flash crash; if the main charge againist him is this incident, then I think he has a fighting chance to prove innocent.
 
He needs to raise bail and then run, not walk, to the Ecuadorian embassy here in London and request asylum (see Julian Assange). Probably only chance for him to escape the wrath of the Empire , ooops i meant the USA.
 
IMO he made 3 errors : - His tax evasion scheme. This is so antisocial to maintain a poor appearance to trump authorities.

It's not tax evasion, it's called tax avoidance, and EVERYONE does it to some degree or the other because IT IS LEGAL.

If it was illegal HMRC would have nicked him long ago.

Don't talk about things you know nothing about.
 
He needs to raise bail and then run, not walk, to the Ecuadorian embassy here in London and request asylum (see Julian Assange). Probably only chance for him to escape the wrath of the Empire , ooops i meant the USA.

The Ecuadorian embassy looks cramped enough with only Assange as a refugee...
Besides have you noticed that among his bond conditions, not only him but also his parents had to hand over their passport ? That sounds excessive if they are not implicated - the kid messed up now they can't leave the country.
Some of his relatives also needed to post 50000gbp bond for,him to go out.
 
Last edited:
NatWest Three's David Bermingham tells flash crash trader: Don't fight extradition
David Bermingham was one of three NatWest bankers who famously fought extradition to the US from 2002-6 on charges linked to the $80bn downfall of Enron

Navinder_Singh_Sar_3276736b.jpg

Flash crash trader Navinder Singh Sarao, who may have caused global stock markets to crash in May 2010 Photo: Telegraph Media Group



By James Quinn, Group Business Editor

3:15PM BST 23 Apr 2015


One of the NatWest Three has advised the British 'flash crash' trader not to fight his extradition to the United States.

David Bermingham, who was extradited with two former colleagues to the US in 2006 in charges connected to the $80bn (£53bn) collapse of Enron, told The Telegraph that Navinder Singh Sarao, who faces decades in a US jail if found guilty of charges laid against him by American prosecutors, should waive his right to an extradition hearing.

"On the assumption British authorities have no right in prosecuting him, my advice would be to waive extradition, get on a plane, and negotiate the best deal he can possibly get if he has done something wrong," said Mr Bermingham. "All holding out does is make things worse."





Mr Bermingham did not comment on the criminal charges laid against Mr Sarao.

The US Department of Justice has charged the Hounslow-based day trader with one count of wire fraud, 10 counts of commodities fraud, 10 counts of commodities manipulation, and one count of “spoofing,” a practice of bidding or offering with the intent to cancel the bid or offer before execution.


The charges relate to activities spanning more than five years, but centre on the 'flash' markets on May 6, 2010, during which the Dow Jones Industrial Average slumped almost 1,000 points in 45 minutes, and which accounted for hundreds of billions of pounds in stock market losses. US prosecutors have emphasised that Mr Sarao remains innocent of the charges levelled against him.

"If you agree to waive your right to an extradition hearing, you can hope to achieve some form of bail when you arrive in the US, and possibly even be allowed to return to the UK until your case is heard," he continued.

natwest_1697056c.jpg

(L-R) Giles Darby, David Bermingham and Gary Mulgrew

He made the remarks following a preliminary court hearing yesterday at which bail was set at £5.05m, and at which his defence said he would contest extradition. A full extradition hearing is likely to take place in August or September.

There are certain parallels between his plight and that of Mr Sarao, give he and his former colleagues were accused by US prosecutors in relation to a major American financial collapse.

"If I were in his shoes I’d think very carefully about getting a US lawyer quickly, and talking to the prosecutors and working out a deal. This is probably not going to end well for him otherwise."

Mr Bermingham, who is now a consultant advising on US extradition, said that if Mr Sarao resists extradition, and ends up being extradited anyway, he will be designated as a fugitive from justice on arrival in the US, and immediately placed in a high or medium security federal jail.

He said that since he and his former colleagues - Gary Mulgrew and Giles Derby - were extradited to the US in July 2006, the legal situation has only worsened.

Mr Bermingham - who wrote a book, A Price to Pay, on his struggle - said that the automatic right of appeal has now been curtailed, and pointed to the introduction by the British government of a 'forum provision,' which means that if UK prosecutors say they have no interest in a case, extradition is all but guaranteed.

The US Department of Justice accused the three bankers of advising Greenwich NatWest, the bank's investment banking arm, to sell a stake in an offshore investment vehicle to Andrew Fastow, Enron's chief financial officer, for a fraction of its actual value, which was later sold to Enron for a higher amount. They were accused of stealing $7m from their employer.

Their extradition came after much public protest, and in spite of appeals to Tony Blair, then Prime Minister, to halt it after concerns that the treaty was one-sided.

Following extradition and subsequent bail, the three men had to remain in the Houston area of Texas awaiting trial.

But the trio pleaded guilty in early 2008 in return for reduced sentences of 37 months, roughly half of which were served, seven months in the US, and 10 in the British prison system following a transfer back in November 2008.

Mr Bermingham spent time in ten different prisons before his release from custody in early 2010.
 
A small anecdote (that really happened) to show how professional the CFTC is:
Many years ago I wanted to start a fund. As all fund managers I had to make disclosure documents (amongst a lot of other paperwork). Because it seemed stupid to me to reinvent the warm water, I copied the disclosure document from a famous existing American fund. I replaced all personal data and track record by my own data and send it to the CFTC.
A few weeks later they wrote me with a full list of things they did not agree on and that had to be changed. The funny thing was that all these remarks concerned text that was copied literally from a disclosure document that they approved before for another fund! But when they approved it before, it was send to them by a famous American fund, and not by an unknown small trader (me) who started a fund. I send the original disclosure document from this famous fund to the CFTC, highlighted all the remarks they made in this original document, and asked why they approved it for the famous fund and not for me? Both documents had for these parts exactly the same text!

Different people get different treatment, this will happen with this trader too.


I guess the intangibles came into play for your filing.
 
Back
Top