UK schoolboy corrects Nasa data error

I come from a family of engineers and I concur. They work with cold, hard science. It's the only thing that matters to them, work-wise. Architects come up with a design, but engineers have to figure out how to actually build that.
 
I come from a family of engineers and I concur. They work with cold, hard science. It's the only thing that matters to them, work-wise. Architects come up with a design, but engineers have to figure out how to actually build that.

My perception is engineers are practitioners of applied science. Therefore, more concern about applications, problem-solving, safety/reliability and cost-benefit analysis. Essentially, less concern about fundamental theories/breakthroughs.

Engineers can get inventions and patents for economic gains/benefits. Scientists would very seldom.
 
My perception is engineers are practitioners of applied science. Therefore, more concern about applications, problem-solving, safety/reliability and cost-benefit analysis. Essentially, less concern about fundamental theories/breakthroughs.

Engineers can get inventions and patents for economic gains/benefits. Scientists would very seldom.

Anytime someone asks I just tell them Engineers are applied physicists from the 18-20th century. Physics is usually ahead of the curve and engineers are lagging on making products work under those previous discoveries. Many time the overlap is pretty significant though.
 
Back
Top