UK Repression Hits New High

I have commented a few times on how repressive the UK is. Some of you probably thought I was exaggerating. There is no First Amendment in the UK, and the "conservative" government has become increasingly intolerant of any criticism of its suicidal immigration policies or of any criticism directed at its rapidly growing muslim population. Recently some fairly prominent foreign right wing figures were detained trying to enter the UK and held in custody, apparently based only on their political views.

As frightening as those incidents were, they pale in comparison to the treatment meted out to a high profile right wing figure, Tommy Robinson. Robinson is an independent journalist who makes videos on the sidewalk, typically criticizing the country's immigration policies or the failure to prosecute horrific muslim crimes. While reporting outside a high profile trial of a group of muslims accused of running a grooming, ie sex slavery, gang, in which young white girls were pimped out and treated in appalling ways, he was arrested and summarily sentenced to 13 months in jail. An order was then issued barring the media from even reporting on his arrest and sentence. https://www.standard.co.uk/news/lon...nson-arrested-for-breaching-the-a3849046.html

This kind of kasfkaesque secret arrest and punishment is apparently legal in the UK. One can easily imagine liberal journalists here being outraged if Putin did such a thing, but they have been remarkably silent over Robinson's plight.

Robinson is at high risk of being murdered in prison, as he is a particularly juicy target for jihadis looking to advance their religion.

It's hard to believe that our own government still considers the UK a close and reliable ally. Their spy agencies were up to their ascots trying to defeat Trump and then smear him. It's clear we no longer share common values with their ruling class. It's time for Trump to take a stand and demand justice for Tommy Robinson.

https://www.mrctv.org/blog/banned-r...-political-reasons-not-laws-reason-banishment

With all of the assaults on free speech going on all over the world, eventually free speech will fight back.

Two female conservative speakers and an Austrian Identitarian leader are going to sue the U.K. over being detained and subsequently banned from the U.K. for criticizing Islam and mass migration.

Canadian Lauren Southern, American Brittany Pettibone and Austrian Martin Sellner have jointly contacted attorneys concerning their situation. All three spoke in a video posted to Southern’s YouTube channel on Saturday...........more at link

https://www.mrctv.org/blog/banned-r...-political-reasons-not-laws-reason-banishment
 
Their spy agencies were up to their ascots trying to defeat Trump
The important question is why do you think that?. In other words, were does this information come from, and why do you think it is true? If you delve deeply enough into these questions, you will find the answers, and then you'll know the truth.
 
here is just one of the many examples of FBI wrongdoing...



You think its not corrupt for the FBI to use a Clinton paid for Oppo research from Russian spies to support a FISA spying warrant against her opponent?

https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/trump-russia-scandal-democratic-rebuttal-memo/


The important question is why do you think that?. In other words, were does this information come from, and why do you think it is true? If you delve deeply enough into these questions, you will find the answers, and then you'll know the truth.
 
Last edited:

Fantastic video. Thanks for sharing.

I wonder how many jihadist muslim clerics have been prosecuted for hate speech? I'm guessing none. Since there are so many no-go zones in Britain now, the police can't really go in and arrest them anyway.

My question is whether this is the result of the establishment being paid off by Saudi Arabia and Qatar to sell out the country or is it just multiculturalist craziness run amok? Any Brits out there willing to risk commenting?
 
I guess you realize that although the DNC paid for completion of the Fusion-Steele investigation, it wasn't the DNC that gave a copy of the report to the FBI.
The term "discredited dossier" is used by IBD, dispite nothing in the diossier having been proven false. And at this point much of it has been corroborated!

In the IBD's bullit point "and they didn't tell the court what the dossier's author— Christopher Steele— had said about this hatred of Trump when vouching for Steele's credibility." What does the word "this" refer to?

No one actually knows, except the FBI and the FISA Court, what the FBI told the court about who funded the dossier, if the subject came up. A truthful answer would be it was a Republican, his name has been made public, opposed to Trumps nomination followed by the DNC. However because the motivation behind the report was political it only means that the content must be corroborated.

See my new thread in this forum entitled "Is the President Schizophrenic -- Or Is it Just a Lack of Integrity? I imagine your real proud to be a Trump supporter.
 
Last edited:
I guess you realize that although the DNC paid for completion of the Fusion-Steele investigation, it wasn't the DNC that gave a copy of the report to the FBI.


I guess the question here would be: So what?

Due to the way the "research" set-up was structured there was never a time when the FBI did not know about it. Bruce Ohr reported to McCabe and was meeting with Fusion regularly to discuss it. And then, there is that little matter of Ohr's wife just coincidently working for Fusion and working on the aforementioned dossiier. So, this bit about when "a copy" was transmitted and by whom is a bogus argument.
 
I guess the question here would be: So what?

Due to the way the "research" set-up was structured there was never a time when the FBI did not know about it. Bruce Ohr reported to McCabe and was meeting with Fusion regularly to discuss it. And then, there is that little matter of Ohr's wife just coincidently working for Fusion and working on the aforementioned dossiier. So, this bit about when "a copy" was transmitted and by whom is a bogus argument.
In all probability without Ohr's wife's connection to fusion the FBI would not have known of the fusion project until Simpson (the Fusion founder) went to the FBI with their alarming findings. So as it turns out we are lucky that Ohr's wife was working for Fusion.
 
Back
Top