Yes, particularly if the mitigation tech is Made in America.
UK Met Office - 2014 NOT the hottest year ever
- Thread starter jem
- Start date
You know... I created a magical device that increases the energy efficiency of every home. Just plug it into the wall and your energy usage is more efficient, I promise. I think the government should make every home have one of my devices, I will have my lobbyists get this passed into law. It will make me a Trillion dollars rich, doesn't matter if it's a complete fraud and doesn't solve any problem. A Trillion dollars sucked out of the economy won't hurt anything else, eh?
just as a matter of interest....
Thread Title: UK Met Office - 2014 NOT the hottest year ever
Real World: UK Met Office - 2014 is on course to be one of, if not the warmest, year on record both globally and for the UK.
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/news/releases/archive/2014/2014-global-temperature
Thread Title: UK Met Office - 2014 NOT the hottest year ever
Real World: UK Met Office - 2014 is on course to be one of, if not the warmest, year on record both globally and for the UK.
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/news/releases/archive/2014/2014-global-temperature
There is no money "sucked out" of the economy, unless you offshore it. Otherwise, it just circulates a tiny bit differently, as it now includes you.
The Seattle Seahawks were on course to win two super bowls in a row.
the headline from your article was...
"3 December 2014 - Early figures from the Met Office show 2014 is on course to be one of, if not the warmest, year on record both globally and for the UK"
in a world where people think before they make stupid comments or troll remarks... a person checks the dates of the statements they quote.
they realize that statements made in early december did not have the full data set for 2014... and in fact according to the OP were likely made based on the data up until october.
the headline from your article was...
"3 December 2014 - Early figures from the Met Office show 2014 is on course to be one of, if not the warmest, year on record both globally and for the UK"
in a world where people think before they make stupid comments or troll remarks... a person checks the dates of the statements they quote.
they realize that statements made in early december did not have the full data set for 2014... and in fact according to the OP were likely made based on the data up until october.
Talk about grasping for straws. But hell yeah, Romney also looked like the next President according to you
And no, not October. Full of pathetic excuses as ever. "Last updated: 3 December 2014" . You were saying about troll remarks?...
You're simply wishing that 28 days of Met Office data for Dec 2014 will overturn the 337 days of Met Office data for 2014, which caused them to say: "2014 is on course to be one of, if not the warmest, year on record both globally and for the UK."
Thing is, you just don't like facts getting in the way of your anti-science, anti-facts, anti-AGW prejudices.
Last edited:
Was 2014 Really the Warmest Year? Here's Why It Doesn't Matter
wow you are such a deceptive wormy little anti science troll.
1st. even if the article was updated on 3 december using novemebers data... that would still only be 11 months worth of data. decembers data was not released til january.
so even in the best case secenario for you, you went with a bullshit headline... which was based on 11 months worth of data...
you were once again being the deceptive troll.
I was not wishing anything..
the title and op I posted were appropriately based on 2014 full year data.
you tried to sneak a bullshit 11 month headline in as if contradicted the thread title.
1st. even if the article was updated on 3 december using novemebers data... that would still only be 11 months worth of data. decembers data was not released til january.
so even in the best case secenario for you, you went with a bullshit headline... which was based on 11 months worth of data...
you were once again being the deceptive troll.
I was not wishing anything..
the title and op I posted were appropriately based on 2014 full year data.
you tried to sneak a bullshit 11 month headline in as if contradicted the thread title.
Talk about grasping for straws. But hell yeah, Romney also looked like the next President according to you
And no, not October. Full of pathetic excuses as ever. "Last updated: 3 December 2014" . You were saying about troll remarks?...
You're simply wishing that 28 days of Met Office data for Dec 2014 will overturn the 337 days of Met Office data for 2014, which caused them to say: "2014 is on course to be one of, if not the warmest, year on record both globally and for the UK."
Thing is, you just don't like facts getting in the way of your anti-science, anti-facts, anti-AGW prejudices.