Quote from Mav88:
So If I manufacture more CDs of a really bad movie, even though they may be already be in oversupply sitting on store shelves, I GUARANTEE that use will go up?
Such oversimplistic notions of supply and demand/use were thrown out long ago. The fact that you find it 'obvious' is really funny.

Quote from TheBlackHand:
eer, no. Films are published on DVD's or Blue Ray. They've never been on CD.
Not quite the same argument though is it because you're talking about a specific film, which in this case would be like talking about a particular brand of fire arm.
Please try harder.
![]()
Not really as you stated:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from Mav88:
UK had access pre 1987, they probabaly chose not to that's all.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If handguns were in minimal circulation and you could not CCW or legally use them as a defensive weapon why would their absence have an effect on armed crime. There also has been a rise in the number of legal firearms in the UK since 1997 and 2010 which seems to be discounted in most pro/anti gun studies.
Quote from TheBlackHand:
eer, no. Films are published on DVD's or Blue Ray. They've never been on CD.
Not quite the same argument though is it because you're talking about a specific film, which in this case would be like talking about a particular brand of fire arm.
Please try harder.
![]()
Well, of course gun control does work, but only in situations where the gun control is actually working, courtrooms, airplanes, etc. But you're right, in places where it's not working, gun control does not work.Quote from Mav88:
You still don't understand, it doesn't matter what the absolute levels were. If I start with handgun level X and decrease it by law, no matter what X is, then liberal theory says handgun gun goes down. It went up, so either gun control doesn't work or liberal;s are wrong. You keep trying to dimish the point by saying 'well the UK has other firearms'- doesn't matter, as we are talking handguns only
Quote from Mav88:
that's right jackwagon, you know full well what the point was but think that the 'CD' mistake invalidates it.
Are you pursuing a political ideology or facts?Quote from Mav88:
You still don't understand, it doesn't matter what the absolute levels were. If I start with handgun level X and decrease it by law, no matter what X is, then liberal theory says handgun gun goes down. It went up, so either gun control doesn't work or liberal;s are wrong. You keep trying to dimish the point by saying 'well the UK has other firearms'- doesn't matter, as we are talking handguns only
Quote from Dragons Teeth:
Are you pursuing a political ideology or facts?
You are on a fools errand if you seek comparisons between legal firearms and crime in the UK and transplanting that argument to the US.
Due to the rarity of handguns in the UK they did not enter the conscious thought of criminals targeting non criminals as they were not carried and if kept at home they had to be safes/lock boxes in locked rooms. I feel your argument would be better served if it focused on the unique circumstances surrounding gun control/self defense in the US