http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/04/us-banks-derivatives-exposure-explodes-to-200-trillion.html
So what does this mean? Anyone care to elaborate?
So what does this mean? Anyone care to elaborate?
These are all notional values and, as such, are largely meaningless.Quote from misterno:
http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/04/us-banks-derivatives-exposure-explodes-to-200-trillion.html
So what does this mean? Anyone care to elaborate?
Quote from misterno:
http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/04/us-banks-derivatives-exposure-explodes-to-200-trillion.html
So what does this mean? Anyone care to elaborate?
So why blame the IRS mechanism for this, I wonder?Quote from Corelio:
The unusual jump is associated with GS and JPM becoming commercial banks. There is nothing "extraordinary" on this report.
The only interesting fact is that the exposure to interest rate swaps dwarfs by several fold their exposure to any other derivative asset. I would suggest that readers start looking at the havoc interest rate swaps start to cause private businesses that sold variable rate debt back in the go-go days and "hedged" with interest rate swaps.
The precipitous drop in interest rates has forced businesses to post collateral against the swaps. So now on one hand we have the Fed pulling the lever of lower interest rates while on the other you have businesses stuck with these swaps and having to post ever increasing amounts of collateral.