Quote from Ricter:
1) Waste of time. If I say something that Obama has, imo, done right, you're just going to say you disagree with it, particularly if you think there's a "Laissez Fairey" out there which would make everything alright if only government would stay out of the way.
2) If I provide my criticisms of Obama, you're going to use it as ammo later.
3) But, for example, what about the National Export Initiative, you disagree with that?
1) So what? that's usually the way debates/arguments work.
2) Only if you changed you mind on the specific criticism, i wouldn't use it to make a blanket statement like "even ricter doesn't support obama."
3) I don't know what it is, enlighten me.
