U.S. Ambassador killed in Libya

Quote from CaptainObvious:

Yes! The entire country is an angry mob. What passes for their government is an angry mob. When they attacked what is for all practical purposes American soil, and killed Americans, that is an act of war on their part. Swift and decisive retaliation is required. We'll see if we have leadership in place that can handle the job. You may excuse this attack and murder of American citizens. I do not!

No one is excusing anything, but you do not need a sledgehammer to kill a gnat. I see you are a Neocon today, okay, I will play along for a bit.:D
 
Quote from Free Thinker:

it was a religious mob. they have scattered by now. who are you going to fight. they dont even have a leader to kill.
so you want to just go drop a bunch of bombs on innocent people? that is murder. oh well, they are just muslims not special white christians like us.

a few weeks ago we have a case where an atheist group recieved death threats because they dared put up a sign mocking christanity. maybe we should drop a few bombs here. just in case.

I know I have posted this many times. But as long as it applies.:)

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/UaS2bRGS86c" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Quote from RCG Trader:

Damn, that actually made sense, you must have gotten a GF!:D

You are one stupid MF, you are more likely to be able to identify specific cockroaches on your bathroom floor.
besides even if we did get each every last one without error the media would portray them as another Rachel Corrie.
 
Quote from RCG Trader:

I know I have posted this many times. But as long as it applies.:)

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/UaS2bRGS86c" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

i miss that guy. he was good.
 
In retrospect it was foolish to put them into a vulnerable position without military protection. Now we have no good options. Nice going, Obama and Hillary.
 
Quote from AAAintheBeltway:

In retrospect it was foolish to put them into a vulnerable position without military protection. Now we have no good options. Nice going, Obama and Hillary.
wow. hell has frozen over. finally something we agree on.
 
The right wingers are definitely over-reacting. Ambassadorships are patronage positions which makes the unfortunate victim
a Democrat, or in the parlance amongst the firebreathers here, a libtard. Do the right wingers still want to express outrage or simply say scratch one libtard?
 
Quote from AAAintheBeltway:

In retrospect it was foolish to put them into a vulnerable position without military protection. Now we have no good options. Nice going, Obama and Hillary.

That would be a good tactical move, except that this is yet another situation that Obama inherited. And he is only halfway through. Bush got 8 to fuck it up. Obama needs 8 to clean it up.:)
 
Quote from RCG Trader:

That would be a good tactical move, except that this is yet another situation that Obama inherited. And he is only halfway through. Bush got 8 to fuck it up. Obama needs 8 to clean it up.:)

Oh brother, still blaming Bush? Bush didn't tell the State Department to put officers into an obviously dangerous situation with no protection.
 
Quote from AAAintheBeltway:

Oh brother, still blaming Bush? Bush didn't tell the State Department to put officers into an obviously dangerous situation with no protection.

it is similar to bush in one way. remember when bush predicted we would be welcomed in iraq as liberators?
 
Back
Top