Something fishy about this whole story.
If it was that easy to spoof the market, you'd all be rich
If it was that easy to spoof the market, you'd all be rich
You're asking them to ignore a blatant, cut and dry violation of the law that any prosecutor will tell you is easily winnable. Having sat in the shoes of a Federal employee I understand that you just can't do that when your job is to prosecute these types of cases. In every event it's important to understand that failure to act in one part of an agency should have no bearing in if the rest of the agency does it's job. That's like saying the LA DA didn't prosecute Roman Polanski aggressively enough so what the hell are they doing still putting pedophiles behind bars in LA.
If your point is that one branch of the SEC shouldn't prosecute obvious violaters because others are getting away with it then sure, your point is made. I happen to disagree with that philosophy, but if that's how you feel then fair enough.Your Roman Polanski example was the exception & not the rule... Inversely... HFT`s & the Big Houses are the rule where as these two disenfranchised chooch`s are the exception.. Thanks for making my point for me.
Twitter filled with scammers that commit worse crimes daily. No one cares?