Thanks. I will try it.
Based on the data, the expectancy is positive, but I don't think it is statistically significant, i.e., the confidence level that it will stay the same for a large sample size is low.
Two Questions For Practicing Day Traders
- Thread starter ironchef
- Start date
Based on the data, the expectancy is positive, but I don't think it is statistically significant, i.e., the confidence level that it will stay the same for a large sample size is low.
Padu just returned and already you lot are picking bits of his ass outta your Boots.
If Padu says he trained Goldman Sachs Traders, I believe him!
I'm sure theres a Room in Padu's House for you, if you're ever Holidaying in India.
If Padu says he trained Goldman Sachs Traders, I believe him!
I'm sure theres a Room in Padu's House for you, if you're ever Holidaying in India.
Yep, makes sense, someone training Goldman Sachs traders while trading forex accounts with not even $100 in it (back then), and losing it all time after time in a matter of days, or like he is doing now, trading these fake combines (not even a "funded" one).
Somehow i think (or better said hope) you are being sarcastic, but these days you never know.
Maybe if he wasn't as dishonest all the time this wouldn't happen?
Last edited:
Don't listen to these Bullies @padutrader
They probably think Sachin Tendulkar is some sort of Ice Cream.
They probably think Sachin Tendulkar is some sort of Ice Cream.
Why do you say it’s random outcome? What is the winning days %? Looks like you’re consistently small positive. Of course, it could have been the other way around. The key question is do you know your edge? If you do you should be able to say it in one clear sentence.
Even with an edge it doesn’t necessarily guarantee consistent results. Trading involves so much.
@padutrader likes to jest and fool around, most of the time he meant well. Besides, some of his advices to me weren't bad.
Guys, let's take it easy and give him some space.
Thanks.
Guys, let's take it easy and give him some space.
Thanks.
It's my personal opinion that liars and lies don't deserve space, that also isn't fooling around in my book.
If he stops doing that he wont be bothered. Honestly i find it weird others are fine with it, but i for one find it very sad that he feels the need to do this at his age. Yes he can post some useful stuff from time to time, but then all undoes it by lying again. You might have noticed but i am not very fond of liars
. And yes, Padu has been exposed as a liar over and over again, then he disappears for some time and then start over, again and again.Anyway, i am going to leave it here, there is no point in arguing with him or about this shit, you can't argue with liars because they believe their own shit. He will probably never change his behavior, which is also one of the most important reasons why he never will be a successful trader, that's not the behavior and the mindset of one that matches with a successful trader, although he will probably never realise that since he thinks he knows it all.
It's not worth my time anymore, so go ahead Padu, quote my posts numerous times again to go on a rant, i won't even read it. The evidence (withdrawals) you were going to post from Topstep will pop up eventually, or not, well, most likely not.
Last edited: