Which is probably most people reading this.
TLDR: 4 leg premium garnering straddle strangle swap thing, idea 2 is selling VXX leaps.
Idea one. Sell a straddle at the strike, buy ITM strangle, where the goal is for the strike to eventually hit one leg of the strangle before expiration.
So my thought is this. If the price stays the same, you make money as the straddle should lose more value than the ITM put and call.
If the price of the underlying moves to one leg of the strangle, that leg gains premium for being ATM, while the other leg loses some (though likely less). They both lose some time decay, but so do the straddle legs.
At the same time, neither straddle leg will be at the money, and so they will lose more time premium combined than both legs of the strangle.
So time should be harsher on the straddle, in your favor, as should a move towards one leg of the strangle, up or down. Both time and movement should devalue the premium straddle more than the strangle, while gains based on movement should stay the same?
I put a ? because that's one area I'm fuzzy on I guess. One other thing, these are options several months out. So yeah. Most my life I hadn't really wished I were less dumb, trying to understand the dynamics of options has changed that.
Second idea: VXX eventually goes higher, eventually goes lower. It seems to be less a matter of if more a matter of when. So does it seem like a sound strategy to sell deep ITM puts of a derivative ETF like VXX with a year or longer duration? Then wait patiently for volatility to spike high enough, long enough so that VXX comes up to where you can buy back the puts for profit.
I much prefer the idea of selling ITM calls against VXX (or heck UVXY), just not right now, because I feel less safe in the idea that volatility can decrease within the next year
TLDR: 4 leg premium garnering straddle strangle swap thing, idea 2 is selling VXX leaps.
Idea one. Sell a straddle at the strike, buy ITM strangle, where the goal is for the strike to eventually hit one leg of the strangle before expiration.
So my thought is this. If the price stays the same, you make money as the straddle should lose more value than the ITM put and call.
If the price of the underlying moves to one leg of the strangle, that leg gains premium for being ATM, while the other leg loses some (though likely less). They both lose some time decay, but so do the straddle legs.
At the same time, neither straddle leg will be at the money, and so they will lose more time premium combined than both legs of the strangle.
So time should be harsher on the straddle, in your favor, as should a move towards one leg of the strangle, up or down. Both time and movement should devalue the premium straddle more than the strangle, while gains based on movement should stay the same?
I put a ? because that's one area I'm fuzzy on I guess. One other thing, these are options several months out. So yeah. Most my life I hadn't really wished I were less dumb, trying to understand the dynamics of options has changed that.
Second idea: VXX eventually goes higher, eventually goes lower. It seems to be less a matter of if more a matter of when. So does it seem like a sound strategy to sell deep ITM puts of a derivative ETF like VXX with a year or longer duration? Then wait patiently for volatility to spike high enough, long enough so that VXX comes up to where you can buy back the puts for profit.
I much prefer the idea of selling ITM calls against VXX (or heck UVXY), just not right now, because I feel less safe in the idea that volatility can decrease within the next year