Twitter and Musk

So why did ADL specifically mention antisemitism?
There are plenty more countries involved with human rights abuse, so why focus on the 'poor victimized Israelies' who go about shooting Palestinians in the back and in the head and targeting the youth, never mind about bulldozing houses etc.

Yeah, so, I call bs to ADL not being biased toward Israel.

The entire organization was founded to combat antisemitism as outlined in its history and has expanded out in the U.S. under Greenblatt to address Black Lives Matter, the migrant crisis, and the actions of the Trump administration. Did you miss the part about the numerous times the ADL criticized the Israeli government for their actions and stances regarding the Palestinians.

I never said the ADL was not biased towards Israel -- I merely stated they have criticized Israel's behavior and stances towards the Palestinians as well. After all it would be hard to be an organization fighting "anti-Zionism" and not have a bias towards allowing a Jewish country (Israel) to exist.

Are you expecting an organization which was found in 1913 to combat antisemitism to suddenly not focus on antisemitism?

The real absurd part here is Musk supporting clowns on Twitter urging violence towards Jews and that the ADL be abolished. Clearly we know where the primary owner of Twitter stands as he continuously promotes extreme right-wing nutcases on his platform and echos their hateful talking points.

Right now "free speech absolutist" Musk is pondering a poll to ban the ADL from Twitter.
 
Last edited:
Sounds like an oxymoron, antisemitism and civil rights in the same breath.
Since when has Israel been concerned with civil rights?
What has Israel done for Ukraine?

This antisemitism bs argument is getting tired, what antisemitism really is, is Jewish lobbyists pushing their own sympathy barrow, mostly toward the gullible USA.

"....In mid-January, the Biden administration asked Israel to send 1950s-era U.S.-made Hawk air defense systems, which have been in storage, to Kyiv to help the Ukrainians defend against a barrage of Russian missiles and Iranian drones. The Israelis reportedly refused.

It was a stunning decision by a country that has both enjoyed $107,806,200,000 in military assistance from the United States between 1946 and 2021 and whose population (like Ukraine’s) is forced to live under the threat of rockets, missiles, and drones—a number of which are also derived from Iranian technology. Israel’s leaders have continued to carry on their “war between the wars”—attacking Iranians and their proxies in Syria and sometimes Iraq to ensure the Israeli population remains secure—including an attack on Iranian facilities this past weekend that U.S. officials reportedly attributed to the Mossad, Israel’s intelligence service. Yet, at the same time, the Israelis seem to be denying even ancient and unused technology to the Ukrainians to secure their own population.

However, no one should be shocked by Israel’s apparent decision to hold onto the Hawks.

Since Russian President Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, the Israeli government—much like the Turkish government—has played a double game, offering rhetorical support for Ukrainian independence and providing humanitarian aid to Kyiv. At least the Turks are willing to sell the Ukrainians weaponry. The Israelis, in contrast, are scrupulously avoiding any policies that will damage Jerusalem’s ties to Moscow...."

While GWB is a terrible source to get any information concerning the ADL, having shown bias on their criticism of right wing extremists starting here and racist shooters starting here, antisemitism and civil rights is far from an oxymoron. Do not make the same mistake nationalists zionists intentionally make, that of painting anti-zionism as antisemitism by painting antisemitism as some pro-zionist charade.
 
So why did ADL specifically mention antisemitism?
There are plenty more countries involved with human rights abuse, so why focus on the 'poor victimized Israelies' who go about shooting Palestinians in the back and in the head and targeting the youth, never mind about bulldozing houses etc.

Yeah, so, I call bs to ADL not being biased toward Israel.

Liberal Jews have been at the forefront of civil rights movements in the US. I wouldn't be surprised if founding members of the ADL were in fact Jewish and did so during an antisemitic time period.
 
I support ADL ban fully. This is one of many organizations specializing in human programming. GWB is a notable product of this kind of programming. The people operating ADL will burn in hell if hell exists of course.
this you?:

All of a sudden people who are suppressing Freedom of Speech every day are on high alert. Freedom of Speech is now the main freedom we have! Thank you, Musk. You made these shmucks agree with you on a very important topic.


Freedom of speech is the law of the land. What is legal is legal. Let's see how it will turn out.

Musk said that freedom of speech is the freedom to say anything within the limits of laws and regulations. This is right. Twitter will not become a racist nightmare or any other nightmare as some idiots claim. Enforcement of laws and regulations will stop it. Musk is not an idiot. He understands reality and he is a ruthless businessman.
The problem with all popular social media sites is that they are not enforcing laws and regulations. They are using rules that they believe are either "good for humanity" or good for their pockets although this is pretty much the same in most cases. Let's hope that this time it will be different.

Right, now, when it is going to be a free speech platform, the left cannot use Twitter anymore. What the hell is Twitter good for? Obviously, nothing.
Did you ever use Google and Wiki?

Free speech is at its best on Twitter. So, shut up, the left cronies.

Who is talking about FBI dirt today? Yes, it is Twitter! Free speech - full speed.


Brains are voting and brains are washed more and more. Twitter is an excellent washing machine. There are many others of course. Free speech is no use to puppet masters. This is why free speech is important. It is as important as voting if not more. It is all written in our great Constitution.
 
I support ADL ban fully. This is one of many organizations specializing in human programming. GWB is a notable product of this kind of programming. The people operating ADL will burn in hell if hell exists of course.

Let's see what the clown Elon Musk is shoveling on Twitter today. Only an idiot would proclaim that the ADL is the ‘biggest generators of anti-Semitism’ and are 'pro-Hitler'.


Elon Musk accuses ADL of being ‘biggest generators of anti-Semitism’ on Twitter
The Twitter CEO’s post about the Anti-Defamation League was in response to a video clip by conspiracy theorist Alex Jones calling the ADL ‘pro-Hitler’
https://forward.com/fast-forward/559523/elon-musk-adl-jonathan-greenblatt-antisemitism-twitter/
 
While GWB is a terrible source to get any information concerning the ADL, having shown bias on their criticism of right wing extremists starting here and racist shooters starting here, antisemitism and civil rights is far from an oxymoron. Do not make the same mistake nationalists zionists intentionally make, that of painting anti-zionism as antisemitism by painting antisemitism as some pro-zionist charade.

GWB is a terrible source of information on any subject. At all. Anywhere and any time.
 
Let's see what the clown Elon Musk is shoveling on Twitter today. Only an idiot would proclaim that the ADL is the ‘biggest generators of anti-Semitism’ and are 'pro-Hitler'.

Elon Musk accuses ADL of being ‘biggest generators of anti-Semitism’ on Twitter
The Twitter CEO’s post about the Anti-Defamation League was in response to a video clip by conspiracy theorist Alex Jones calling the ADL ‘pro-Hitler’
https://forward.com/fast-forward/559523/elon-musk-adl-jonathan-greenblatt-antisemitism-twitter/

Once again Musk the clown threatens a lawsuit. At this point everyone knows the threat is hollow. If Musk actually does sue -- which is unlikely -- then all the ADL will need to do to pull out all the hateful tweets posted on Twitter 2.0 to get the case quickly dismissed as groundless. Coupled with Elon cheering on and promoting the violent extremists. Musk has previously threatened to sue other organizations which factually report on all the violent hate posts on Twitter 2.0 -- none of these threats went anywhere.

Musk Blames Anti-Defamation League For X’s Poor Ad Sales, Threatens Lawsuit
https://www.forbes.com/sites/willsk...r-ad-sales-threatens-lawsuit/?sh=730350da00e8



ADL-sue-meme.png
 
Last edited:
Once again Musk the clown threatens a lawsuit. At this point everyone knows the threat is hollow. If Musk actually does sue -- which is unlikely -- then all the ADL will need to do to pull out all the hateful tweets posted on Twitter 2.0 to get the case quickly dismissed as groundless. Coupled with Elon cheering on and promoting the violent extremists. Musk has previously threatened to sue other organizations which factually report on all the violent hate posts on Twitter 2.0 -- none of these threats went anywhere.

Musk Blames Anti-Defamation League For X’s Poor Ad Sales, Threatens Lawsuit
https://www.forbes.com/sites/willsk...r-ad-sales-threatens-lawsuit/?sh=730350da00e8



View attachment 322479

britney-spears-huh.gif


I thought you'd be happy?


I believe that NBC has now started a trend. We can now have media outlets demanding that Google defund advertising on CNN, MSNBC, and other media outlet websites. What comes around goes around... NBC started this nonsense, they aren't going to like where it finishes. Wait till the media outlets also find crowds of people demanding advertisers don't place ads on their TV channels as well. The escalation of this nonsense can get very ugly quickly -- now that the Cancel culture is in gear.

The left-wing Cancel Culture by which they want to eliminate people from their jobs, community, and from being heard is the very foundation of "forced disappearance" as a policy. When leftists run governments they work to silence any voices that object to their policies; this can be seen in their bringing of politically driven charges against opponents to using leaks to the media in attempts to ruin people.

Disappearing people is simply the next step in "cancelling" when a fully (not moderate) left-wing government is in power.

The bumbling Trump administration is just a minor league example for what will occur when an extreme left-wing administration (which is driven & "competent") is placed in charge.
 
Elon Musk Blames Anti-Defamation League for Destroying Website He Ruined Himself. Musk has come around to the point in the process where he is going to blame the Jews for his self-destruction.

Elon Musk comes around to blaming the Jews
https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2023-09-05/elon-musk-blames-jews-threatens-adl

Elon Musk has long been known for blaming everyone else but himself for the various fiascos visited upon his companies — meddlesome bureaucrats for COVID-related production slowdowns at Tesla, the Pentagon and conniving rivals for the loss of a government contract by SpaceX, nasty woke advertisers for the decline of X (ex-Twitter).

So what were the chances that he would get around to blaming the Jews? Based on the evidence at hand, 100%.

Over the weekend, Musk launched a ferocious, spittle-flecked attack on the Anti-Defamation League, which describes itself (accurately enough) as “a global leader in combating antisemitism, countering extremism and battling bigotry wherever and whenever it happens.”

The ADL, because they are so aggressive in their demands to ban social media accounts for even minor infractions, are ironically the biggest generators of anti-Semitism on this platform.
— Elon Musk goes after the Jews on his social media platform X


Musk decided that the ADL is responsible for (in his words) “most of our revenue loss [at X]. Giving them maximum benefit of the doubt, I don’t see any scenario where they’re responsible for less than 10% of the value destruction, so ~$4 billion.”

He asserted that the U.S. advertising revenue at X is “down 60%, primarily due to pressure on advertisers by @ADL (that’s what advertisers tell us), so they almost succeeded in killing X/Twitter!” And he tweeted that he has “no choice but to file a defamation lawsuit against the Anti-Defamation League.”

Not to put a fine point on things, but all this shows Musk to have gone utterly off the rails and over the edge of conspiracy-mongering paranoia. It’s the most extreme outburst of antisemitism by a purportedly mainstream public figure in more than 100 years.

Musk’s hate-spasm easily outflanks the previous champion of public antisemitism, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who was caught on tape in July arguing that COVID-19 was “targeted to attack Caucasians and Black people” while leaving Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese relatively immune. It’s as if Musk challenged Kennedy’s effort to seize the antisemitism crown by saying, “Oh, yeah? Watch this.”

Musk’s outburst makes the position of Linda Yaccarino, the formerly respected entertainment executive who accepted the job of X’s CEO to restore the platform to the good graces of corporate advertisers, hopelessly untenable. Why she doesn’t resign is a mystery. His words also should prompt the federal government to question his suitability, and that of his company SpaceX, to hold government contracts of any kind.

Musk has bought into the notion — advanced by openly antisemitic X accounts — that the ADL fosters antisemitism by calling it out wherever it appears.

“The ADL, because they are so aggressive in their demands to ban social media accounts for even minor infractions, are ironically the biggest generators of anti-Semitism on this platform,” he tweeted on Sunday. He was responding to a tweet quoting the far-right conspiracy-monger Alex Jones calling the ADL “the most pro-Hitler organization I’ve ever seen.” He further implied that the ADL is “somehow complicit in creating the very thing they complain about!”

Musk implicitly endorsed the hashtag #BantheADL,” advocating banning the organization from X, by replying, “Perhaps we should run a poll on this.” Surely he knows that his right-wing followers would swamp any such poll on the “yes” side.

It’s crystal clear that X’s revenue problem is Elon Musk and his policies. He has welcomed dispensers of antisemitism, racism and other varieties of hate speech back onto the platform, while amplifying misinformation about purported COVID treatments and homophobic slurs retailed by conspiracy movements such as QAnon.

Corporate advertisers in the consumer market don’t need the ADL to tell them that it’s bad for their brands to be associated with a social media platform bristling with neo-Nazis and other denizens of the cultural underworld.

It’s true that the ADL has had its eyes on Musk and X for some time. That’s because the platform’s content moderation policies have fostered a documented surge of hate speech since Musk acquired it last October.

In March, the ADL reported that Twitter had refused to remove tweets or accounts that incited violence against Jews. Two months later, it followed up with a report that Musk’s decision to reinstate 65 Twitter accounts that had previously been banned for hate speech had contributed to the antisemitism surge.

The tweet-and-reply threads of many of these accounts, the ADL found, had become “magnets for vile antisemitic content.” They were rife with such “familiar antisemitic tropes” as “conspiracy theories about George Soros and the Rothschild banking family controlling global politics, finance, and media” and accusations that Jews are aiming to “destroy ‘the West’ by promoting transgender identities and lifestyles and ‘replacing’ white people via immigration (e.g., the Great Replacement).”

Tellingly, beyond stating his determination to “clear our platform’s name on the matter of anti-Semitism,” and declaring, “I’m pro free speech, but against anti-Semitism of any kind,” Musk in his weekend outburst made no effort to address the specific points raised by the ADL — he merely asserted that the organization’s accusations were “unfounded.”

Obviously, that won’t do. According to ADL Chief Executive Jonathan Greenblatt, Yaccarino reached out to him last month, leading to a “frank + productive conversation ... about @X, what works and what doesn’t, and where it needs to go to address hate effectively on the platform,” he tweeted.

ADL will “give her and Elon Musk credit if the service gets better ... and reserve the right to call them out until it does,” Greenblatt added.

Late Tuesday, however, the ADL issued a further statement.

Citing Musk’s weekend outburst and his cozying up to neo-Nazis, the organization said, “Musk is engaging with and elevating these antisemites at a time when ADL is tracking a surge of bomb threats and swatting attacks of synagogues and Jewish institutions, dramatic levels of antisemitic propaganda being littered throughout Jewish and non-Jewish residential communities, and extremists marching openly through the streets in Nazi gear. All of this is happening in a context of the highest number of antisemitic incidents that ADL has tracked in more than 40 years — and just two weeks away from the Jewish holidays of Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur.”

The ADL added, “This behavior is not just alarming nor reckless. It is flat out dangerous and deeply irresponsible. We need responsible leaders to lead, to stop inflaming hatred and to step back from the brink before it’s too late.”

There are few precedents in American history for someone with the public renown of Elon Musk voicing or hosting opinions of such unalloyed virulence. The closest analogue is probably Henry Ford, who in 1920 began publishing screeds in the Dearborn Independent, a local weekly he had acquired, alleging the existence of a vast Jewish conspiracy to achieve world domination.

“Musk is sometimes compared to the innovator Henry Ford,” Josh Marshall observed Tuesday on his website, Talking Points Memo. “The comparison seems increasingly apt, if not in the way many have intended.”
 
Back
Top