To implement the turtle system, you need a stomach of steel to endure the drawdowns... by implication, you also need to be well-capitalised... with both of these in place, you have a chance...
Quote from TriPack:
Axeman,
It sounds like you've read the pdf on this website regarding the original turtles system?
http://www.originalturtles.org/system.htm
I just read it and it is very informative regarding the turtles method. I think you are right - the edge of this system is in market selection and diversification. It is choosing the 1 or 2 markets that will have big winning trend moves that will offset all the other losses the system incurs in all the other markets it trades.
And because the stock market is a market that generally trends upward, buy and hold is a profitable long term approach. But the turtle method will outperform buy and hold in other commodity markets that don't have a long term upward bias.
Quote from axeman:
Just by looking at the win rate and pfactor, I can say it has
an edge. Only problem is, its not enough to beat buy and hold
in a single market.
The question then becomes, does it beat the average buy and hold
across multiple markets, when played in parallel against
multiple markets.
peace
axeman
Quote from axeman:
Depends on the frequency.
A marginal edge which trades at 1000 times the rate of a good
edge will work wonders.
peace
axeman


Quote from nononsense:
Axeman,
I know about many fast little trades. That's my bread and butter game. I can tell you that I would never want to trade your "marginal edge" at 1000 times the rate of a good edge.
I only trade "good edges" fast. Good luck in doing it your way.![]()
nononsense