Managing billions of dollars of skittish institutional money is much different from managing a few million dollars in a P/A.
This is a mystery to me. Goldman Sachs traders should be the elites. What are they not only under-performing but getting shipwrecked? A person of my calibre will never even get a chance to a job interview at Goldman Sachs. Yet, at least, I'm not shipwrecked.
Why do elite traders (not referring to folks here) of Goldman perform so poorly?
This is a mystery to me. Goldman Sachs traders should be the elites. What are they not only under-performing but getting shipwrecked? A person of my calibre will never even get a chance to a job interview at Goldman Sachs. Yet, at least, I'm not shipwrecked.
Why do elite traders (not referring to folks here) of Goldman perform so poorly?
"Funds" offer the fee structures their clients are comfortable with. Clients call the shots, not managers. Read up on consumer sovereignty -- there's a Wiki page -- if you're not already familiar with the term from college Econ class.True. Big AUM kills performance. But big AUM guarantees fat salaries to fund managers given the management fees. I hope to see more funds move towards performance-based fees away from management fees so that they get rewarded as fund managers and not as asset gatherers.
%%I'd be happy if this proves to be a correct assessment:
'Jones, who has been frustrated with the macro trading environment, said things are "on the verge of a significant change" and that the current market is reminiscent of the bubble of 1999.'

