I have no dog in this fight but people arguing for electricity using alternative means tended to oversimplify their outlooks. All the alternatives have their own environmental issues.
1. Hydro, completely destroyed the river ecosystem and the damage done to fishery is huge. Norway is farming Salmon now. The US Northwest are tearing down dams and restoring the river ecosystem with great expenses.
2. Nuclear, you heard of Chernobyl, Three Mile Island, Fukushima? In Southern Cal, San Onofre nuclear power station, shut down for 10 years, waste fuel will remain active for hundreds of years if not disposed off. The station and the surrounding will not be habitable.
3. Wind. Not dependable and in CA, killed lots of migratory birds, no one has any solution yet.
4. Geothermal. No one figures out how to do it efficiently and cost effectively yet. And it is not available in most places.
5. Electric cars, the conversion from fuel to electricity to battery charge to electric motor is much less efficient than from fuel directly to ICE. And we haven't even considered the cost and energy of manufacturing Li ion batteries, the environmental damage of Li extraction, and the toxic end of life battery disposal and their impact to the environment.
Realistically, the only solution other than nuclear fusion is for all of us to use less energy.