Trump's Muslim travel ban may be dumb but laid-back, do-nothing Obama is even dumber

By Piers Morgan for MailOnline


Donald Trump’s demand that all Muslims be banned from America has worked.

It sparked exactly the kind of furore he hoped it would, and we’re all once again talking about little else but Donald Trump.

This was no casual aside or slip of the tongue.

It was a deliberate, carefully planned delivery of highly toxic, inflammable rhetoric designed to get the whole country up in arms.

And new poll numbers indicate Trump’s popularity has gone UP not down in the last 36 hours.

Love him or loathe him, and I personally love him but loathe this latest stunt (and have emailed him to say this) Trump knows how to dominate the news cycle like no presidential candidate in history.

He’s been wall-to-wall on U.S. network and cable news shows since making his ban-Muslim comments, and social media has been predictably ablaze with people violently agreeing and disagreeing with him.

Today, it’s clear that far from wrecking his campaign as many thought it would, his outrageous plan has increased his standing with core Republican voters.

Why?

Well not because they hate all Muslims, although I’m sure some do.

No, it’s because Trump used 9/11 to justify his stance, and there is no more powerful tool for a Republican candidate to utilise when whipping up votes than the worst terror attack on U.S. mainland.

As with all Trump ‘scandals’ that we’ve witnessed since he entered the race in June, there is a kernel of truth to what he says.

2F3E923700000578-3354481-image-a-7_1449760028825.jpg



It is undeniable, as he claims, that a significant number of Muslims, or rather twisted jihadists who’ve hijacked Islam, hate America and want to destroy it with more attacks like 9/11.

How many?

Where are they?

What are they planning?

Nobody knows. That’s the problem.

All we can be fairly certain of is that some, like the husband and wife who committed the San Bernardino massacre last week, are lurking in the shadows of U.S. cities and towns right now, radicalised and armed to the teeth, ready to kill and maim Americans.

Just as they are in Britain, Germany and France.

There will be more Islamic-related terror outrages, and with each one Trump will say he’s been vindicated.

It’s fine for people like me to point out that far more mass shootings will be committed by white Christians, as they have been and will be, but most Americans are immune to gun violence and frankly don’t care.

They just see a very dangerous medieval enemy in ISIS that is marauding around the world beheading, stoning and setting fire to anyone that stands in their way.

And now, since San Bernardino, ISIS and its sympathisers are seen to be living and plotting on Americans’ own doorsteps, and it’s freaking everyone out.

Muhammad Ali is right to say, as he did in a statement last night, that ‘true Muslims know that the ruthless violence of so called Islamic Jihadists goes against the very tenets of our religion.’

He is also right to demand political leaders make more effort to better explain Islam and emphasise that ‘misguided murderers have perverted people’s views on what it really is.'

But the reason Trump’s new, stunningly divisive message is resonating with so many Americans is that none of his opponents seems to have a clue how better to deal with this deadly threat, especially President Obama.

Like the new enemy, Trump hits us –verbally – very, very hard.

There’s no lengthy, calm, measured, professorial thesis on big issues, of the kind we regularly see from Obama.

Trump just takes a firm position and smashes it into the public consciousness in brusque, simple, uncompromising language that everyone can understand.

And when it comes to ISIS, the American people are desperate for some kind of clarity.

As Obama is seen to be fiddling while Rome burns, Trump is seen, whether you agree with him or not, to at least have an understanding of the immediacy and scale of the threat and a clear determination to try and deal with it.

There’s a political motivation, of course there is.

The more Trump gets attacked for his controversial opinions on Islamic fundamentalism, the more airtime he gets and the more his ratings soar.

That’s why he does it.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...a-dumber-says-Piers-Morgan.html#ixzz3u2IZb7h4
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 
Here we see an interesting piece. we see a smart guys telling the truth but it has to be wrapped in establishment cloth. Just like Matthews yesterd bowed before the alter of his paymasters today we see Piers do the same thing... Piers is smart his analysis interesting but he has sold his soul...

here we see him genuflecting before the establishment money...

"Muhammad Ali is right to say, as he did in a statement last night, that ‘true Muslims know that the ruthless violence of so called Islamic Jihadists goes against the very tenets of our religion."

---

Every educated person knows the Koran is of 2 minds when it comes to conquering infidels.
Every educated person knows Muslims took over africa and tried to take over europe with 500 or more battles and attacks. If the message of the Prophet is peace with Western culture... it sure as hell is not easy to find.



Matthews yesterday, morgan today, lets see is this is part of some new organized campaign to flip the script for the establishment or bring Trump back into the fold.
 
If Trump had proposed a reasonable policy such as suspending Visas from a list of countries that tend to export a sizable number of extremists for a number of months until proper screening procedures could be arrived at then many in the U.S. could support him.

However he proposed banning all Muslims which is just pandering to the lowest form of hatred and demagogy in order to get elected by the bigoted and uniformed.
 
"It’s fine for people like me to point out that far more mass shootings will be committed by white Christians, as they have been and will be".

That is a flat out lie.
 
One thing is true. Like him or hate him his anti-establishment rhetoric is appealing to many people who hate politicians more than they can hate Trump.
 
If Trump had proposed a reasonable policy such as suspending Visas from a list of countries that tend to export a sizable number of extremists for a number of months until proper screening procedures could be arrived at then many in the U.S. could support him.

However he proposed banning all Muslims which is just pandering to the lowest form of hatred and demagogy in order to get elected by the bigoted and uniformed.

Like Reagan, Trump paints with a broad brush. The details can be worked out. Saying that Trump mainly appeals to the bigoted and uninformed is as inaccurate as it is condescending.

The Piers Morgan column is not nearly as negative as I expected. He seems to basically agree with Trump, but knows he can't come right out and say it. Of course, he's a brit and has a better handle of where this leads from the unhappy experiences in his own country, France, Belgium, etc.
 
Back
Top