Trump’s Approval Rating Over His Handling Coronavirus Is Crashing Down, Down, Down…

[WeToddDid2]

This is simply untrue. You are in a fantasy world.

Please explain. Where is healthcare better? Also, please state specifically why and how it is better somewhere else?

I find is shocking that a scientist continually post opinions as facts.

You infer that every baseless opinion that you post is somehow in some delusional world a fact.

 

[Tsing Tao]

COVID-19 Isn’t As Deadly As We Think

(Slate)

 

[Wallet]

COVID-19 Isn’t As Deadly As We Think

(Slate)

 

[UsualName]

NY locked down about a square mile in New Rochelle. This is excellent news. Other states should follow this lead.

The Kirkland nursing home finally got tests for their 35 residents and 31 came back positive. That’s a dam shame. Those illnesses are a result of a lack testing.

 

[WeToddDid2]

NY locked down about a square mile in New Rochelle. This is excellent news. Other states should follow this lead.

The Kirkland nursing home finally got tests for their 35 residents and 31 came back positive. That’s a dam shame. Those illnesses are a result of a lack testing.

Is that really a true statement? Is it possible that if they did have the testing kits the outcome could have been exactly the same?

The nursing homes that I have been to have one eating room and all of the patients eat in the same room at the same time.

 

[UsualName]

Is that really a true statement? Is it possible that if they did have the testing kits the outcome could have been exactly the same?

The nursing homes that I have been to have one eating room and all of the patients eat in the same room at the same time.

Yes. Testing reduces spread and identifies infected earlier, reducing mortality.

 

[Black_Cat]

 

[WeToddDid2]

Yes. Testing reduces spread and identifies infected earlier, reducing mortality.

Is this virus highly contagious? Were all the people in the nursing home in the same nursing home? Can someone be asymptomatic and spread the virus?

If any of the above is true, it is possibility that testing kits would not have changed the outcome.

But, obviously, I cannot expect you to do any thinking much less probabilities.

It is absolutely impossible to make the statement the testing kits would have changed the outcome with a 100% certainty. But, there is no way that you can understand that. All you can understand is orange man bad. Orange man's fault.

 

[WeToddDid2]

Yes. Testing reduces spread and identifies infected earlier, reducing mortality.

BTW - There is already evidence of asymptomatic transmission of the virus.

So, your statement above illustrates complete and total ignorance at best.

 

[piezoe]

Please explain. Where is healthcare better? Also, please state specifically why and how it is better somewhere else?

I find is shocking that a scientist continually post opinions as facts.

You infer that every baseless opinion that you post is somehow in some delusional world a fact.

you have google. Use it.