"In an especially egregious case, a report submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) said that a two-year-old girl died in the state of Virginia less than a week after receiving a Pfizer-BioNTech shot.
The report spread on social media, and an article claimed the death came during "vaccine experiments on children."
But the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) told AFP the report was "completely made up," with a professional athlete listed as the patient and a world leader's name used for the person who reported the incident."
https://www.france24.com/en/live-ne...atabase-exploited-by-covid-19-vaccine-critics
Do you understand that
"anyone can submit a report of an event to VAERS, even if it’s not clear that a vaccine caused the problem. All reports are accepted into the database without determining whether the event was caused by a particular vaccine, and therefore, as a disclaimer warns, submissions “may include incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental and unverified information.”
So they have to prove a negative but you yourself have got nothing
And everyone has a big dick on the internet, your post history is clear proof of your deep history in virology. And how does virology make you an expert in vaccines?
Says the Trumptard basing his 'research' on facebook posts by other Trumptards
